Faith that Saves

We continue wrestling with the meaning of sola fide and what the Reformation teaching of justification by faith alone means. In the last two posts we looked at some of the thinking of Francis Turretin on this subject. He gave us the thought of the Socinians, Remonstrants (Arminians), and the Roman Catholics on this issue, which set out the contrast very well. The historical Protestant view has been that faith is the instrument by which the grace of God in Christ comes. It is not that faith is something that man has to work up and then act in his own power or even with some help from God, but that faith demonstrates the nothingness and inability in man. As Scripture teaches us, “For this reason it is by faith, in order that it may be in accordance with grace” (Romans 4:16). Faith is that which receives grace rather than that by which man works to obtain righteousness.

It is true that a faith that saves is a faith that works. But notice something about the previous statement. In former times a faith that saved was a type of faith that was given by God and all it did was to receive grace. But it is said to be a faith that saves, though indeed the faith did not save but received Christ Himself and His grace which saves. To be consistent with that and with Scripture which speaks of works that flow from love, the faith which works is the faith which receives Christ Himself and His grace and so the works that flow from the person who has faith are really the works of the life of Christ in that person. Justification comes through faith because faith is the instrument through which Christ and His grace come. When a person is justified that person has the life of Christ in him or her as his or her life. That life must be expressed and yet it will only be expressed through the grace that is received. Faith is what receives grace, so faith has nothing to do with works that merit any favor before God.

Here is more from Turretin on the subject:

“However the orthodox differ wholly from them [Socinians, Remonstrants, Romanists]. They teach that faith is the organic and instrumental cause of our justification and that justification is ascribed to it, not properly and by itself (inasmuch as it is a work or as if it was the righteousness itself by which we are justified before God; or as if by its own worth or by the indulgence of God it deserves justification in whole or in part), but improperly and metonymically (inasmuch as Christ’s righteousness, which faith apprehends, is the foundation and meritorious cause on account of which we are justified). So that it is said to justify relatively and organically; relatively because the object of faith is our true righteousness before God; organically because faith is the instrument for receiving on our part and for applying to ourselves, that righteousness.”

This is a statement of massive importance that will help to clear the fog that surrounds the use of faith in justification. First, he says that the orthodox do not just differ a little from the other groups, but that they differ wholly from them. The teaching of those groups on the use of faith is so different from the orthodox that their view of justification is then wholly different. We must not miss the importance of this. Second, the orthodox teach that justification is indeed ascribed to faith, but in a wholly different way than the others (Socinians, etc) do. The others say that faith is that in and of itself which fulfills what God requires or that faith is that by which people can work to obtain righteousness which fulfils what God requires. In contrast to that Turretin says that orthodox position is that faith is said to justify because it is the object of faith that justifies. The sinner is said to be justified by faith, then, because the object of faith (Christ Himself) is our true righteousness before God. Christ Himself and His righteousness are the objects of faith and so one is said to be justified by faith.

This is exciting stuff from Turretin as the Gospel of grace alone and Christ alone opens into glorious view. Sinners are justified by faith alone because faith is the instrument of receiving Christ and His grace. Faith does not work but receives Christ and His righteousness by faith. When Christ and His righteousness are received, righteousness has been applied. Christ is united to the believer through faith and so when Christ is united and married to the believer, the believer has the very righteousness of Christ applied through faith. Instead of the Socinian and Arminian view which teach us that faith is what God requires instead of keeping the Law, we have faith as what is needed for Christ who alone can keep the righteous law of God perfectly. The object of faith is what is needed rather than faith itself being a work. Instead of the Roman Catholic view which teaches a faith that works and is then declared righteous, the orthodox and biblical view is that a sinner is declared just by faith because the sinner has received Christ and is given His perfect righteousness. How utterly glorious is Christ and His grace.

4 Responses to “Faith that Saves”

  1. a helmet's avatar a helmet Says:

    The notion that faith must work is displayed in various reformed sermons today as well. “Faith alone saves, but saving faith is not alone” is the device. This ends up in a faith plus works righteousness as well. In the reformed perspective the works are by affirmation non-meritorious and a result of righteousness rather than its cause. But a re-definition of works in such a way does not undo the fact that the righteousness is based on the person’s own works. For if a person has no good works in his/her life, he/she is simply not justified in the first place. Thus, in reality, faith that works is equal to faith plus works.

  2. Richard Smith's avatar Richard Smith Says:

    Indeed we are “saved by faith alone but not a faith that is alone.” However, that is far from ending up with a faith plus righteousness scheme. In fact, this is far from the truth at least as it was understood previously. The reason that faith is not alone is because the “job” of faith is to receive grace and to receive Christ (those are not opposed). When Christ is received, He is the life of the soul and it is grace that works in the soul and produces good works. 1 Corinthians 15:10 shows this point: “But by the grace of God I am what I am, and His grace toward me did not prove vain; but I labored even more than all of them, yet not I, but the grace of God with me.” Galatians 2:20 makes the same point as well: “I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself up for me.” When the sinner is free from earning righteousness for salvation or even for sanctification, then s/he is free to love God in all that is done. There is no need to earn righteousness because heaven was earned and bought by the works of Christ and His righteousness is imputed to the believer. If a person has no good works in his or her life, then that person does not have the life of Christ in his or her soul.

    A faith that works is not equal to faith plus works because faith only works in the sense that it receives Christ who works. Faith is also said to work by love but that does not mean that faith itself works, but that the love and grace of God that faith receives is then worked out in by love. Christ suffered for all the debt of sin and so sinners who have Him do not go to hell. Christ earned a perfect righteousness so that sinners who have Him will go to heaven. The only place for good works is to demonstrate the glory of God which true believers are to love more than anything else. If we have to work for righteousness in any way, then we are operating out of self-love rather than a pure love for God.

  3. a helmet's avatar a helmet Says:

    If a person has no good works in his or her life, then that person does not have the life of Christ in his or her soul.

    What good works? What are they?

  4. Richard Smith's avatar Richard Smith Says:

    Greetings:

    There are many definitions of good works that one can find. However, let us think of good works as the things that come from a person that is united with Jesus Christ and the life of Christ is in that person (Gal 2:20). We can also think of good works as being the fruit of the Spirit (Gal 5:22-23). After all, I Corinthians 13:1-8 tells us very clearly that without love nothing we do is of any real benefit or good. We also know that James (1:27) tells us that true religion is looking after orphans and widows. We also know that we are to love our neighbor as ourselves. A good work, therefore, is at least doing what is truly good for others that flows out of love for God primarily which then flows toward other human beings to the glory of God. A good work is (as Matthew 5:16 shows) with the intent that God be manifested to others. The work itself without the intent is not true love. True love wants the other person to have what is best and the best is to
    know God.

    Matthew 5:16 “Let your light shine before men in such a way that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven.

    John 10:32 Jesus answered them, “I showed you many good works from the Father; for which of them are you stoning Me?”

    Ephesians 2:10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.

    1 Timothy 2:10 but rather by means of good works, as is proper for women making a claim to godliness.

    1 Timothy 5:10 having a reputation for good works; and if she has brought up children, if she has shown hospitality to strangers, if she has washed the saints’ feet, if she has assisted those in distress, and if she has devoted herself to every good work.

    I Timothy 6:18 Instruct them to do good, to be rich in good works, to be generous and ready to share,

Leave a comment