Edwards, Resolutions 20 & 40

December 13, 2006

“Resolved, to maintain the strictest temperance to eating and drinking” (Resolution 20).

“Resolved, to inquire every night, before I go to bed, whether I have acted in the best way I possibly could, with respect to eating and drinking” (Resolution 40).

I Corinthians 10:31 commands all to eat and drink and whatever they do to do it to the glory of God. These resolutions reflect the heart of a man that took the word of God seriously. It also reflects a heart that wants to do all things to the glory of God. In the modern United States, this is totally a foreign concept. However, it is one that we will do well to meditate on. The thought of today is to eat as you want and as you please. Food is thought of in terms of how much it pleases the person eating or the person buying or being entertained. On the other hand, food is thought of in terms of the body. Many are fanatical about what they eat in order to maintain the appearance that they want.

Eating for the sheer pleasure of it with no or little thought of God is an act of idolatry. Eating in order to make myself look good without thought of God is also an act of idolatry. The Greatest Commandment is to love God with all of our heart, mind, soul, and strength. In some way, then, believers are to eat out of love for God and His glory. That which moves man to eat should be the glory of God and the regulation for what should be eaten and how much is the glory of God. Man is not to be like the animals that eat by instinct put into them.

While some eat in order to maintain an appearance or to be healthy, that can be no more than self-love. God is to be our ultimate priority in all that we do, not self. Our souls are to be given to God first and foremost in order to glorify Him. We might need to eat food that we ordinarily do not eat in order to glorify God in being with others. Man is an eternal being and his body must not be his god. Man is to serve the living God and not the god of health and food. This is a foreign concept in the modern day where man thinks that as long as he does good things for himself he is serving God.

Let us use an illustration to make the point here. Prayer is far more than what the average person does. The average religious person has a list and asks God for things. He or she then tacks on the name of Jesus at the end. However, we are to pray for the glory of God in all things first and foremost. So all the words lifted to God without concern for His name and glories are really acts of idolatry since they are primarily about our own selfish concerns. Yet we should give thanks for the food we eat and that should be a prayer. Our prayer before our meals should be far more than just a few empty words to God, it should be in line with those set apart to do all for His glory. A clue for this is found in the so-called “Lord’s Prayer” which Jesus gave to the disciples as a pattern for prayer in Matthew 6. First of all, man is to pray that God’s name be hallowed, His kingdom to come, and then His will to be done. Then and only then is man to pray for his daily bread. But if we love God as the Greatest Commandment commands, the reason that we are to pray for our daily bread is so that we can live in a way that hallows His name, advances His kingdom, and enables us to do His will.

What we call “returning thanks” or “saying grace” should really be giving thanks to God for the food and asking Him to sanctify or set apart the food for His use in our bodies which are to be used for His glory. Man is to be totally devoted and set apart to live for the glory of God and that must include what he eats and drinks and the reason he eats and drinks. While there are many secondary reasons for why man is to eat and drink the way he does, if the secondary reasons become primary man becomes and idolater of himself. This is why Edwards could make a resolution regarding temperance but even more importantly to act the best way he could in reference to eating and drinking. He saw himself as a vessel in the hands of God and he wanted to do all that he could, even in eating and drinking, to glorify God. So should all believers.

Edwards, Resolution 16

December 11, 2006

“Resolved, never to speak evil of anyone, so that it shall tend to his dishonor, more or less, upon no account except for some real good” (Resolution 16).

The Scripture tells us to watch our lips and to love our neighbors as ourselves. We are expressly told that every careless word will be brought into judgment (Mt 12:36). We are told that every thing that we do for the least of them we are doing for Christ and what we don’t do for the least of them we don’t do for Christ (Mat 25). We are told that to call people certain name are violations of the sixth commandment and are at least linked with murder in the heart. “When there are many words, transgression is unavoidable, But he who restrains his lips is wise” (Prov 10:19). Without doubt our words are very important.

When Isaiah saw the Lord in Isaiah 6 his view was turned to himself and what he saw was that his lips where unclean and that he lived among a people of unclean lips. I think that what this shows is that Isaiah knew at that moment that his heart was vile and that what came from his inner man made him unclean. This was what Jesus spoke of in Mark 7: “20 And He was saying, “That which proceeds out of the man, that is what defiles the man. 21 “For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications, thefts, murders, adulteries, 22 deeds of coveting and wickedness, as well as deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride and foolishness. 23 “All these evil things proceed from within and defile the man.” It is what comes from within the man that defiles the man.

As we take these verses and apply them to Edwards’ resolution, we can see why he did not want to speak evil of anyone in order to dishonor them. Certainly that is against the Golden Rule and the commandments. But he also did not want to sin against God either. In David’s confession of his sin with Bathsheba and his part in her husband’s murder he confessed that he had only sinned against God (Psalm 51:4). If we speak evil of others we are guilty of murder as Jesus set out and so our sin is really against God. When we speak evil of others we are speaking against the image of God since all men are made in His image. We would do well to watch our mouths and what we say as well.

But another reason that we should want to emulate Edwards in this is because we should desire pure hearts. We should want to have hearts that love others and even our worst enemies. We are commanded to love the sheep of Christ and we are commanded to love our enemies. Can we love others and speak evil of them at the same time? This is not to say that we have to speak with syrup on our lips all of the time, but we need to be wary of speaking evil against others because each time we do we violate the Greatest Commandment and the Second Greatest Commandment as well. A desire for a pure heart and to love God and all people should make us keep a close watch on our lips. The tongue “is a restless evil and full of deadly poison” (James 3:8). When we speak evil of men we are striking at them with a deadly poison that is perhaps worse than vipers.

We must also be careful not to speak evil of people because of the influence our sin will have on the people that are listening. Our words sink to the depths of their being and certainly have some influence on the purity of heart in other people. We certainly do not love anyone when we speak evil of others and dishonor them with our lips. One, we sin against God because we are verbally attacking His image. Two, we wrong the person that we are speaking against when we dishonor them before others. Three, we dishonor the person we are speaking to in that we are not loving them and being a bad example to them. We also are possibly putting wrong ideas in them by our words that they will use to sin against others with. Four, we certainly dishonor ourselves. So we can see why Edwards resolved never to speak evil of anyone unless it would bring about some real good. If this same resolution was practices in churches across our land, it would certainly result in greater peace and harmony.

Edwards, Resolution 15

December 9, 2006

“Resolved, never to suffer the least motions of anger to irrational beings” (Resolution 15).

This is another step in submission to God. Irrational beings might mean animals or perhaps inanimate objects. Many people get angry at cars, computers, and all sorts of mechanical objects. Others get angry at animals and whatever might prevent them from getting what they want when they want it. All animals and all objects, however, are instruments of the sovereign plan of God. In reality, then, when people get angry at irrational beings and inanimate objects they are getting mad at how God is using those things. The stated resolution, therefore, is to be in submission to God and His sovereignty. But even more, the resolution is not to suffer the least motions of anger. In other words, he wanted an immediate submission to God. He wanted to so walk with God that his spirit would not even rise against anyone or anything in the slightest at any moment.

Edwards believed in the sovereignty of God with all of his being and he wanted to be in meek and willing submission to whatever God willed for him. This is a true recognition of God’s sovereignty in all of live and a desire to want to please Him in all things. How trite and infantile modern man is when he wants to know how far he may go in certain activities and for it not to be sin. Rather, like Edwards, we should desire and long for pure hearts in all ways and at all times no matter what God brings to us. It is simply recognition from the heart and not just a head doctrine when desires like this are expressed. When Edwards died he basically choked to death over a period of a few days. His doctor was amazed as Edwards died without the appearance of the slightest perturbation or dismay. He simply meekly received what God had ordained to bring Him glory.

Edwards, Resolution 14

December 8, 2006

“Resolved, never to do anything out of revenge” (Resolution 14).

In this resolution we can see the heart of a man that desires to love all for the sake of His name and not act from selfish motives. Taking revenge is not an act that reflects love for God and our enemy, but reflects a person that loves himself more than anything or anyone else. Revenge is a self-centered act as if one is the true God. “Never take your own revenge, beloved, but leave room for the wrath of God, for it is written, “VENGEANCE IS MINE, I WILL REPAY,” says the Lord. When we take revenge, we are playing God in meting out personal punishment which is really going over what justice require. We are to love our neighbor and leave the rest to God. Instead, “Never pay back evil for evil to anyone” (Rom 12:17). Even more, “‘You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the sons of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself; I am the LORD” (Leviticus 19:18). Rather than take revenge, man is to love. Returning good for evil and love for hatred is what is to some degree what is meant by being meek as in the Beatitudes (Mat 5) and is the fruit of the Spirit (Gal 5). When a person resolves never to do anything out of revenge, that person is resolved not to act like the devil and to act like Christ. Christ died for His enemies. This is submission to the sovereignty and love of God who allows and brings all trials to us, even the people that abuse us out of evil hearts and yet God intends it for good.

Beatitudes 6: Those Who Mourn 1

December 7, 2006

“Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted” (Matthew 5:4)

As shocking as it sounds to most people that it is those that are poor in spirit that are blessed (inward happiness or joy), the beatitude that we will look at today is even more shocking to the modern mind in the USA, if not everywhere. While we normally think that it is the people that are self-confident with high self-esteem that have true inner happiness rather than the poor in spirit, yet we can understand with more explanation how that might seem so. However, this beatitude tells us that those who mourn are the people that are truly happy and this seems so contradictory that it shocks people to hear that mourning and joy can be reconciled.

We must first consider that happiness is not in outer things but in God Himself. Happiness will only happen when a person is reconciled to God and His sovereign will. As long as we are fighting God and not content with what He wants, we will be unhappy and have inward tension. A lot of man’s unhappiness is the result of being frustrated with things that happen that man does not want. So when man submits to the Lord and seeks the will of God, man may find happiness because he is submitted to what God wants. The hidden or decretive will of God is always done and cannot fail to happen. If it is God’s pleasure that man is happy in a circumstance, then man should be happy in that circumstance since it is the Lord who brings it to pass. Spiritual growth occurs when man becomes more and more resolved to be pleased in all that the Lord wills.

Happiness should not be thought of in relation to how things affect me, but on how they relate to the glory of God. It is His joy and love in me that gives true joy. Mourning over the things that are against His glory is not inconsistent as a sign of true love and joy. When God puts such a love for Himself in the hearts of His people that they mourn over things because of how they relate to His name, then the same love that gives us reason to mourn is also attended with the joy of love for His glory. In other words, mourning over things that on this earth are against His name and glory is not inconsistent with true love and joy for God. It is the presence of God in the soul that brings the soul to a sight of things that produce true spiritual mourning, but it is also His presence that brings true joy to the soul. These things are not inconsistent in the spiritual realm.

I will even argue that a soul that does not mourn over certain things cannot ever know true joy. Not only, then, is a true mourning out of a true love not inconsistent with true inner happiness, but a true joy will not be possible on this earth apart from some degree of mourning. The things that God has put together here on earth are opposite of the way man things from his naturalistic way of thinking. The natural man cannot understand how mourning and happiness can go together, but that is because he is not thinking from a God-centered viewpoint. Let us think of Christ for an example. We know that Christ wept and mourned. We also know that Christ never sinned and so had perfect love for the Father at all times. We also know that Christ was given the Spirit without measure and the fruit of the Spirit is love and joy. If we put all those things together, can we imagine that Christ did not love the Father and have joy in Him while He wept and mourned? We can also know that Christ would not have wept and mourned in the same way if He had not loved and had joy in the Father. We can conclude that the divine life in a human soul will cause such a love and joy in the Father that man will mourn for certain things while in the midst of his love and joy in the Father. This is to be like Christ.

The affections are surely in view here. As we have affections of joy and delight, so there are affections of mourning as well. The mind sees or apprehends those things that are cause for mourning but the affections must feel it as well. We feel an inner pain when we mourn and have heaviness of heart. We must feel pain when that which we love is dishonored and trod in the dust. It must hurt us inwardly to see that beauty which we love to be spoken of in an evil fashion and mocked. The honor and glory of God which we love more than anything is being mocked and dishonored. How can we not have an inward response of pain to this? How can we love and delight in the cross without hurting to hear it despised and mocked? Surely that is the heart of Paul in Phil 3:18?

If our priority in prayer comes from a desire for the glory of God, how can we be without feeling when His name is dishonored? If our real desire is for His kingdom to come, then how can we watch the backward movement of the Church without inward pain? If our love is for His will and pleasure to be done, then how can we watch His will and pleasure being trampled on with each passing moment? This is an issue of the heart and it is an issue of our spirituality. If we are lukewarm, then our mourning will be lukewarm. If we are cold of heart, our mourning will be cold if we have any at all. If we have warm hearts for God and His glory, we may have pain when we mourn at times. The degree of our love for God and joy in Him is seen by our mourning for His name and kingdom.

A person who is poor in spirit mourns over the lost honor and glory of God more than his own. That person mourns over God’s kingdom more than his own and mourns over God’s pleasure more than his own. The degree of mourning corresponds to our depth of love for Him. The heart that hurts over God’s honor is the one that loves Him. The heart that loves His honor more than self is the one that loves Him. The one who loves the glory of God more than that of the self is the one that mourns when His glory appears to be eclipsed. In other words, it is not inconsistent for a person that loves God and has great joy in Him to mourn for Him at the same time.

C.S. Lewis put it this way: “The Lord finds our desires not too strong, but too weak. We are half-hearted creatures, fooling around with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered to us, like an ignorant child who wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. We are far too easily pleased.” It is because our desires for God are too weak and our desires for ourselves are too strong that we mourn for the wrong things and therefore have no joy in our mourning. A zeal for God is necessary if we are not to be lukewarm. Surely we can see that a faith in the living and all-delightful God who is beautiful beyond description will inspire a zeal to some degree. Surely this love and faith for Him will move our affections and make us feel for Him. We feel for family, ourselves, and things of the world. Surely we should have affections and feeling for God. Loving Him with all of our being includes the affections.

Paul instructs us in this matter as well: “and not only by his coming, but also by the comfort with which he was comforted in you, as he reported to us your longing, your mourning, your zeal for me; so that I rejoiced even more” (2 Corinthians 7:7). Paul heard of the longing, mourning, and zeal for him and this caused him to rejoice even more. This may sound self-centered if read in one sense, but let us not forget what Paul told them earlier in the letter: “Not that we lord it over your faith, but are workers with you for your joy” (II Cor 1:24). Paul worked with those people for their joy and did not see that it was inconsistent when they mourned for him as an apostle of Christ. A true mourning is a sign of true love for Christ which must be attended with a true joy.

Again, in the same letter, we see Paul not wanting to cause the people sorrow. “But I determined this for my own sake, that I would not come to you in sorrow again. 2 For if I cause you sorrow, who then makes me glad but the one whom I made sorrowful? 3 This is the very thing I wrote you, so that when I came, I would not have sorrow from those who ought to make me rejoice; having confidence in you all that my joy would be the joy of you all” (II Corinthians 2:1-3). In another letter he wrote this: “Convinced of this, I know that I will remain and continue with you all for your progress and joy in the faith” (Philippians 1:25).

As we have seen, Jesus wept and Paul had great affections. We do not mourn because we are half-hearted creatures fooling around with and desiring the world more than Christ and as such we are not like Christ or Paul. We do mourn over the absence and loss of what we love or desire. We mourn over lost games and money. We mourn when we do not get something we desire. Mourning and what we love the most go together. If we love God and His glory and kingdom the most, that will be our source of mourning in the sense that we will mourn when His glory is trod in the dust or when His kingdom is not advancing.

Do we mourn over our declension in love, faith, and prayer? We should mourn over God’s glory and kingdom, sin, others, and ourselves as to spiritual declension and sin. We should mourn over our lack of love and prayer. The Stoics desired not to desire so they could be at a perfect equilibrium at all times. They did not want to be disappointed with a loss or something bad that happened to them. But that is not Christianity. As Jonathan Edwards said in Religious Affections, true religion consists in the affections. As one greater than Jonathan Edwards said, “and though you have not seen Him, you love Him, and though you do not see Him now, but believe in Him, you greatly rejoice with joy inexpressible and full of glory” (I Peter 1:8). One even greater said this, “The kingdom of heaven is like a treasure hidden in the field, which a man found and hid again; and from joy over it he goes and sells all that he has and buys that field” (Mat 13:44). A faith that has affections like that is a faith that will mourn with true happiness. Jesus said so and that means the issue is settled. May your week be filled with mourning.

Edwards, Resolution 13

December 7, 2006

“Resolved, to be endeavoring to find out fit objects of charity and liberality” (Resolution 13).

Believers should always be looking for people to show mercy and charity to in order to glorify God through Jesus Christ. But not everyone is a fit object of these things in terms of physical relief. Many people have their hands out, but not many are fit objects of charity. We must try to be sure that people are not just begging as a way to avoid labor and are really needy. Most people have limited means and so in order to be good stewards and honor God as they want to they need to try to be sure that individuals they help are fit objects of charity.

In trying to find fit objects for charity we emulate God in the Gospel. There are many people that want to be saved, but they do see themselves as truly needy and without means to help themselves. Many want God to save them but do not really think that God needs to do it all. They want God to help them so that salvation will be easier than doing it all by themselves. So in finding people that are truly needy we look for people that truly cannot help themselves and so in an analogous way they are like those that are poor in spirit. In this our help for people is like the Gospel which helps those by sheer and total grace with no expectation of a payback. In this way Christians show the world in some way the Gospel of grace that is of nothing but mercy.

Edwards, Resolution 12

December 5, 2006

“Resolved, if I take delight in it as a gratification of pride or vanity or any such account, immediately to throw it by” (Resolution 12).

Edwards was a man that guarded his heart and mind in order to love God and glorify Him rather than do anything for himself apart from the glory of God. He saw the incredible danger of pride and vanity and saw that whatever came from that had to be done away with. “The fear of the LORD is to hate evil; Pride and arrogance and the evil way And the perverted mouth, I hate” (Prov 8:13). While God is a God of love, He does hate pride. Pride is the swelling up of self and all that is done from pride is done from a narrow and selfish love for self. One cannot do anything for the glory of God and do it from pride at the same time. God is opposed to the proud in the sense that He stands against them in battle alignment (James 4:6). God fights the proud and will bring them down. Edwards saw that pride was such an enemy of God that he knew that if he did something out of pride it was not to the glory of God and as such his heart would be hardened by whatever it was that he took pleasure in. So he determined to examine his heart to be sure that what he did or obtained was not to gratify his pride and vanity. He resolved to keep such a watch on his heart that he would watch his heart closely for a delight in something that sprang from pride. This is recognition of the state and danger of the human heart.

“For You are not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness; No evil dwells with You. 5 The boastful shall not stand before Your eyes; You hate all who do iniquity” (Psa 5:4-5). This text should focus our attention as it did Edwards. God takes no pleasure in wickedness, yet we are to do all for His pleasure since He does all for His own glory and pleasure (Psa 115:1-3). Man is to seek to try to please God and clearly God takes no pleasure in pride. No evil dwells with God and pride is evil. So for those who desire to dwell with God, they must beware of pride in all instances. If a person wishes to stand before God, that person must realize that the boastful (form of pride) will not stand before Him. The text even says that God hates all who do iniquity and we know that all that has pride cannot be anything but iniquity.

“Pride goes before destruction, And a haughty spirit before stumbling” (Prov 16:18). Here we see that pride precedes destruction and the haughty spirit precedes stumbling. In other words, when we see that this verse goes along with God fighting the proud, we see why the proud are destroyed and the haughty stumble. God is able to humble the proud and He will do it. A man or woman that knows that God fights the proud and brings destruction upon them is the person that realizes how much God hates pride and learns to hate it too. So when we look in our hearts and know that what we have done or obtained has been from pride, what is the proper response of the person that realizes that God hates pride and that I should also? It is to cast away whatever was obtained by pride in order to please God. No matter how much I desire something and am gratified by it, if I desire it or obtain it because of pride then I am fighting God and have or desire something that God will hate because of my pride. The safest course of action is to cast the thing away, even with detestation.

Human beings are by nature proud and selfish. If God has not broken and humbled a person’s heart, then all that the proud person does is sin and nothing but sin. Even the outward righteous acts of the unhumbled person is done from pride and so done out of an idolatrous heart. While man does not like this as it cuts into his self-righteous heart and tells man that his self-righteousness is as filthy rags, it does not negate the truth of the assertion. All acts, no matter how good they may be in appearance, when they are moved and motivated by pride come from an idolatrous heart and God judges even our best actions as less than worthless.

Can we say that Romans 1:25 does not teach us about religious man too? They “exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man” (Rom 1:23). “For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen” (Rom 1:25). All of these things people do in religion when the religion is not that set out by the Creator. People exchange the glory of God for an image, even an image of God that is unworthy of Him in the mind. People exchange the truth of who God is for a lie and so they worship and serve themselves. What if man’s religion and worship are moved from pride? Are not these things to be cast away as well? What if we find that our technological toys, houses, cars, preaching, worship, and traditions are moved by pride and vanity rather than the truth of God?

Edwards, Resolution 11

December 2, 2006

“Resolved, when I think of any theorem in divinity to be solved, immediately to do what I can toward solving it, if circumstances don’t hinder” (Resolution 11).

Here is the heart and mind of a man that desired God. Edwards was a man that spent his life thinking about God and the things that related to God. This resolution is required by a man that intends to love God with his mind and to keep his first two resolutions which I will list: “Resolved, that I will do whatsoever I think to be most to God’s glory and to my own good, profit, and pleasure, in the whole of my duration, without any consideration of the time, whether now or never so many myriads of ages hence” (Section of Resolution 1). “Resolved, to be continually endeavoring to find out some new invention and contrivance to promote the forementioned things” (Resolution 2).

When a person studies the Bible and/or theology, there are seeming contradictions and issues that arise. One can choose to ignore those, handle them simplistically, or dive to the depths of the issue. Edwards seemed to always want to dive to the depths of the issue. Yale University Press has put out four volumes of Edwards’ Miscellanies, from a through 1360, in which he wrestled with many issues. Some of his wrestling with issues or musing on paper extends for several pages. It is obvious that he took his theology seriously from his many writings and from his resolutions.

Some think that Edwards was guilty of novelty in his theology and even used too much philosophy. The older Southern Presbyterians Robert Dabney, James Thornwell, and John Girardeau certainly did. While they would defend him at points, they seemed to believe that he was innovative at too many points in his theology. I would like to present another view. I believe that Edwards was a man that started with God and His glory at all points. This made it harder for him to fit with any particular theology that might be more driven by other issues. Edwards strove to make all that he did flow from the glory of God and that primarily. He did this in his sermons, his theological writings, and his more philosophical writings as well. While he was an orthodox theologian, he did differ because of his thorough God-centeredness at all points. While his logic was precise, it seemed that he was more concerned that his theology flow from the glory of God and end in the glory of God than he was with holding to a traditional way of putting things. This caused many to look at him as a man with novel views.

Edwards ran into many problems that he had to work out from his radical God-centered view of things. He had more problems to solve than other theologians because he worked from a different paradigm. Systematic theology is very concerned about logical consistency within the doctrines that are held. That is a very good and noble goal. However, Edwards wanted consistency with the glory of God. It is not that he wasn’t concerned with logical consistency between the doctrines, but he was more concerned with the consistency that a doctrine had with the glory of God. This caused him to think through his doctrines from a different view than others did.

As an example, we can look at the difference Dabney had with Edwards’ ethics. Dabney thought that Edwards was a Utilitarian. On this Dabney is simply very wrong. In his writing on The Nature of True Virtue Edwards tried to use more of a philosophical language in setting out theological truths. I think this is what threw Dabney off in trying to read Edwards’s writings on ethics. Edwards used the phrase “Being in general” in that work and if Dabney or anyone does not get that definition right a great misunderstanding will occur. The term, as Edwards used it, simply meant God and all intelligent creatures. Dabney seemed to think that Edwards used it to say that man’s definition of good is simply to do that which leads to the greatest good for the most. Edwards meant that we must do what is for the glory of God out of love for God or we are not doing what is best for all men either.

Edwards drove himself to continually work on theology in order to work it out in a consistent manner with the glory of God. While others have misunderstood what he was doing, he is a great model for all of mankind to follow. Out of love for the glory of God we should pray and strive that all of our theology and practice flow from the glory of God and tend to the glory of God. That is what it means to love God while we do theology and Bible study. Imagine what it would be like to study theology and the Bible while breathing out desires and love for God. That is what Edwards did and that is what we should do too.

Beatitudes 6: Poor in Spirit 3

December 2, 2006

“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5:3)

This week we will be looking at what the text tells us is the direct reason why the poor in spirit are blessed. It is because “theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” On the surface this does not seem to be much of a reason to be blessed or have true inner joy in the present. However, when we probe a little deeper this is seen to be a blessing far beyond any other. In fact, this is perhaps the greatest reason to seek the experiential aspect of being poor in spirit and this teaches us even more about what it means to be poor in spirit. The blessing of what one is given by grace by being poor in spirit is as opposed to works, merit, and self-effort as a text can be.

What is the kingdom of heaven? As has been so well put in past days, a kingdom is where the king reigns. Now if we think this through, we see that those who are poor in spirit are blessed because they have the kingdom of heaven. But those that are not blessed do not have the kingdom of heaven and so they are of another kingdom. This surely points to the biblical truth that the libertarian view of free will is simply bogus. As Luther put it, man is like a horse ridden by one or the other. Man is ridden by the devil or by Christ. Man is not free to have a third choice, but man is under the dominion of one kingdom or another. As Colossians 1:13 puts it, “For He rescued us from the domain of darkness, and transferred us to the kingdom of His beloved Son.” To be in the kingdom of Christ is to be delivered from the domain (power and authority) and kingdom of darkness (devil). Now while that is putting it in rather stark terms, the picture should be quite clear. Men and women are all under the authority and power of the evil one unless they are delivered from it and transferred to the kingdom of the Beloved (Christ).

Luke 11 gives us this concept from the lips of Christ: “17 But He knew their thoughts and said to them, “Any kingdom divided against itself is laid waste; and a house divided against itself falls. 18 “If Satan also is divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand? For you say that I cast out demons by Beelzebul. 19 “And if I by Beelzebul cast out demons, by whom do your sons cast them out? So they will be your judges. 20 “But if I cast out demons by the finger of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.” Jesus is showing that there are two kingdoms. One kingdom is that of Satan and the other is that of the kingdom of God. Satan ruled and rules by his influence, authority, and power and part of that was by demonic influence. When Christ came and cast out demons, this demonstrated that the kingdom of God was there.

The Gospel is presented to us in terms of the kingdom in many places. When Jesus first started His ministry it is said that He went about preaching the Gospel of the kingdom (Mat 4:23; 9:35). When Jesus was speaking of the end times He spoke of the Gospel of the Kingdom being preached to the whole world before the end would come (Mat 24:14). As mentioned above, salvation is presented in Colossians 1:13 as being a transfer from the domain and authority of darkness to the kingdom of the Beloved.

Let us take a look at another passage. “So Jesus was saying to those Jews who had believed Him, “If you continue in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine; 32 and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.” 33 They answered Him, “We are Abraham’s descendants and have never yet been enslaved to anyone; how is it that You say, ‘You will become free ‘?” 34 Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who commits sin is the slave of sin” (John 8:31-34). Here we see that Jesus was telling the Jews that those who were His disciples were truly free because they had been freed by the truth. The Jews did not understand and told Jesus that they were Abraham’s descendants and had never been enslaved. Apart from the absurdity of that since they had been taken into captivity on previous occasions, Jesus was referring to the slavery of sin. All that continue in sin are slaves of sin. So we see the two kingdom approach again and yet without the using the term “kingdom.” All are slaves of sin unless they are disciples of Christ. Only those who are disciples of Christ were and are not slaves of sin. These and these alone are the people that are free.

We also see the same teaching in different ways throughout the New Testament. We see this taught very clearly in Romans: “16 Do you not know that when you present yourselves to someone as slaves for obedience, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin resulting in death, or of obedience resulting in righteousness?
17 But thanks be to God that though you were slaves of sin, you became obedient from the heart to that form of teaching to which you were committed, 18 and having been freed from sin, you became slaves of righteousness.
19 I am speaking in human terms because of the weakness of your flesh. For just as you presented your members as slaves to impurity and to lawlessness, resulting in further lawlessness, so now present your members as slaves to righteousness, resulting in sanctification” (8:16-19). All men are slaves of just one of just two things. All people are slaves of sin or they are slaves of God and of righteousness. There is no autonomy of the human will here at all since all are under the authority and power of either Satan through sin or God through righteousness. As Romans 5:21 puts it, “so that, as sin reigned in death, even so grace would reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” Men are ruled by sin or by grace. As Ephesians 2:1-3 sets out, man is dead in his sins and trespasses and follows the course of the world as it is set out and determined by the prince of the power of the air. The only rescue is by the mercy, love, and grace of God (Eph 2:4-10). Again, the same teaching is set out.

Throughout the New Testament Christ is called the “Lord Jesus” and the “Lord Jesus Christ.” At the end of times every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord (Phil 2:8-11). He is the King of kings and the Lord of lords (Revelation 17:14; 19:16). For Christ to be King there must be something that He rules over and that means that there is a kingdom. His kingdom is in the hearts of His people and His kingdom is within His people (Luke 17:20-21). Christ lives in the hearts of His people by His Spirit and it is the Spirit’s work in the hearts that sets out the life of His kingdom.

Now how does this relate to the blessing of being poor in spirit? I hope that it crystal clear by now that the blessing of being poor in spirit is that the kingdom of God dwells in those people and those alone. The reign and rule of Satan is through sin which is really pride and self-centeredness. It is a terrible thing to be ruled over by an evil person. Being full of pride and self is evil since those things are opposed to the glory of God. That means that all people that do not have the reign of Christ in them are those that are ruled by evil people (self and the devil). But those that are poor in spirit are those that have been emptied of pride and self as rulers which are those things that the devil reigns by. We must remember at this point that people that are outwardly moral but not delivered from pride and self are simply very wicked people in their self-righteousness. Religious people can be as proud and self-centered as anyone, if not more so. But only those that are poor in spirit have the reign of Christ and the Kingdom of Heaven in the heart. That is a true blessing.

Those that are not poor in spirit are ruled by pride and self which are the tools of the devil and even the character of the devil. Being poor in spirit is a work of grace in the heart of a person so that the person does not trust in his own righteousness by pride and self. Being poor in spirit means that a person is empty of self (not perfectly) and so has room for the reign and life of Christ. We can easily see how the reign of Christ and of grace is a blessing. As Colossians 1:13 shows us, this kingdom is a kingdom of the Beloved Son. In this kingdom, then, there is love and even more love than an earthly soul can imagine. If Christ dwells in a person, then that person is full of the very love of God in the Person of Christ who dwells in His people by the Spirit who pours out the love of God in the hearts of believers (Rom 5:5).

Those that are poor in spirit are those that have been emptied of self and pride. How is that a blessing? Because Christ must work humility in hearts in order that the heart may receive grace (James 4:6). A person that is full of self and pride can never know what love is since that person is too focused on self to love. Pride is the opposite of humility and love. A proud person is ruled by self and will not be ruled over by the humble Savior and Lord who works humility into the hearts of those He rules over and reigns in. In fact, a proud person does not have the life of Christ in him because there is no room for anyone but self in that heart. So the poor in spirit are blessed because they have Christ as their Savior and Lord. He rules in them.

One other aspect of the blessing of the kingdom in the hearts of the people is that sin and death no longer rules over those in that kingdom. Sin is the worst thing that can happen to people as it leads to hardness of heart and then hell. Living in sin and pride is to treasure up wrath for the day of wrath (Rom 2:4). What a blessing it is to be delivered from slavery to sin and to treasure up treasures in heaven. What a blessing it is to be delivered from hate and hating (Titus 3:3-4) as unbelievers do as seen by the light of reality to the kingdom of the Beloved. What a blessing to be delivered from the kingdom of darkness to the kingdom of Light. What a blessing to be delivered from the horror and rule (devil) of selfishness and pride to the reign and rule of grace and love. There can now be no question why the poor in spirit are blessed. Now we must pray for the grace to seek it with all of our hearts.

Edwards, Resolution 10

November 28, 2006

“Resolved, when I feel pain, to think of the pains of martyrdom and of hell.” (Resolution 10).

We might be tempted to think of this as just a mind game or trick that Edwards used in order to win over pain or to make life easier in a day that did not have the pain relief medication that we have in our day. However, we should not think of these Resolutions like that. The Resolutions were meant to help Edwards focus on eternity in order to live to the glory of God now and forever. So we will attempt to understand this in that light.

What spiritual benefits could there have been that Edwards was thinking of in this Resolution and how will it help us in our day? I think that there are a few possible ways of looking at this. One, there is always the possibility that Edwards was striving to understand how to endure pain to the glory of God. After all, we should suffer pain to the glory of God since whatever we do is to be done to the glory of God (I Cor 10:31). Paul was spoken about in Acts 9:16 when the text says this: for I will show him how much he must suffer for My name’s sake.” Paul’s sufferings were indeed used by God to advance the kingdom of God and the Gospel to the known world at that time. We can then see Paul’s view in the next two verses:

Romans 8:17and if children, heirs also, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with Him so that we may also be glorified with Him.

Philippians 1:29For to you it has been granted for Christ’s sake, not only to believe in Him, but also to suffer for His sake,

While it is hard to know what kind of pain Edwards was speaking of, whether physical or internal, or pain of illness or of persecution, we don’t have to exclude any of these. While Paul was more likely speaking of pain inflicted by persecutors of the faith, the verses do not have to be limited to that in principle. We know that God disciplines and trains His children in many ways (Heb 12:4-11). We know that God brings illness on His children for His purposes of training them. So we should learn to deal with pain and discomfort in a way that we would glorify Him and indeed would be to suffer for His sake. Whether we live or die we are His: “8 for if we live, we live for the Lord, or if we die, we die for the Lord; therefore whether we live or die, we are the Lord’s. 9 For to this end Christ died and lived again, that He might be Lord both of the dead and of the living” (Rom 8:8-9). No matter where we are or what condition we are in, we should live to the glory of God.

This also teaches us to think of things from the eternal perspective. The pain of martyrdom is something that each believer should prepare for. Any believer might at any moment be called upon to die for Christ, even in the United States. Acts 7:20 gives us a powerful example of what each believer is called to do: “And when the blood of Your witness Stephen was being shed.” The Greek word for “witness” in this text is martus. In Acts 23:11 we have another very interesting verse in this light: “But on the night immediately following, the Lord stood at his side and said, “Take courage; for as you have solemnly witnessed to My cause at Jerusalem, so you must witness at Rome also.” The word for witness in this text is martureo. At this point, I think, the root of the English word “martyr” should be clear. Stephen was the Lord’s WITNESS when he died. Paul was called to be a WITNESS when he went to Rome to preach Christ there. In Revelation 1:5 Jesus is called the faithful witness. And then we have the case of Antipas: “and you hold fast My name, and did not deny My faith even in the days of Antipas, My witness, My faithful one, who was killed among you, where Satan dwells (Rev 2:13).

We then have the words of Revelation 12:11: “And they overcame him because of the blood of the Lamb and because of the word of their testimony, and they did not love their life even when faced with death.” In that text we have the word “testimony” which is marturia in the original language. To be a witness of Christ and to bear testimony to Him was to be a martyr in that day and in some way our own. Each person that bears witness to Christ has to die to self in order to bear witness to Christ out of a true love for Him. Each person should realize that to be killed for that witness is possible. So we must train ourselves to think through certain thought processes now in order to stand firm at a time like that. One of those is to think of pain that we have now and realize that we must honor Christ with and in that pain. Another way that Edwards mentions is to think of how little the pain is in light of the pains of hell. That points to the grace of God who delivers sinners from the pains of hell.