Musings 88

September 6, 2015

One of the most obvious ways (from Romans 1:18-32) that God hardens hearts and turns men over to sin is when He hardens their hearts toward Himself and turns them over to various forms of humanism. The core aspect of sin is always in relation to God.

1. Men suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them.
2. Men exchange the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man
3. Men exchange the truth of God for a lie, and worship and serve the creature rather than the Creator
4. Men do not see fit to acknowledge God any longer
5. Men are haters of God
6. Men approve the sinful practices of others even though God hates those practices

It is possible for preachers, even conservative preachers, to suppress the truth in unrighteousness? It is possible for preachers to exchange the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man? It is possible for preachers to exchange the truth of God for a lie, and worship and serve the creature rather than the Creator? It is possible for preachers not to see fit to acknowledge God any longer. But can it be possible for preachers to hate God? Is it really possible for a man to be outwardly devoted to the things of God and yet hate the true and living God? Is it really possible for a man to preach a gospel that speaks of Christ and yet hate the true and living God?

If a man is not preaching the truth of the nature of God then it is certainly possible that the preacher does hate God. It is from hatred for the truth of God that moves some men to preach what is not true about God. The unbeliever is at enmity with the true God, which should show us that the preaching of a real unbeliever (regardless of how religious that unbeliever is) is an act of enmity toward the true God. If the churches in this nation and this nation in general are under the judgment of God, then there is no doubt that we are being turned over to a spiritual blindness and given over to blind leaders as well. When the spiritual leaders in name are blind, they are also dead. But despite their deadness to spiritual things, that does not keep them from thinking that they are spiritual leaders. These spiritual leaders (in name) still hate the true God and all of their religious teaching and preaching are committed to the teaching and preaching of a false god and they do that out of enmity and as a way to suppress the truth of God. They suppress the truth of the true God because they hate Him and do not want Him as God.

The weight of this is enormous and should awaken people to the importance of truth. Any man can take a pulpit and preach morality and good works. Any man can take a pulpit and preach something of an exposition of the text and speak nice words of Jesus and of God. But it is also true that all of those things can be done as an act of enmity toward the true God while the preacher is deceived about the true God. Is there any wonder that the true God is not being preached today? Is there any real question why we are having such a hard time finding preachers that declare the truth of the living God in our day? It certainly appears that there is more enmity toward the living God being spread than the truth of God is. It certainly appears that the preachers (as a whole, but not absolutely all) want to hide God from the people. Would they do that if they loved the true God and the people?

It is the highest love for a man to tell others the truth of God, so surely it is as far as love that one can have not to tell others of the truth of God. If it is the highest love for a man to tell others of the love of God, then surely it is enmity toward God and man to give men the wrong teaching of God. What a terrible judgment on a person, a church, and a nation to give them over to hardened hearts where they don’t see that they are in darkness concerning Him. What a terrible judgment to send on a people to give them preachers who are at enmity with Him and will not speak the truth about Him. What a terrible judgment it is to have learned men in the letter of the Bible and nice men too who are at enmity with the truth of Him even as they write learned books about their false god. Oh how we must have a man here and a woman there who will give themselves to ask God to change hearts to love Him. We must have people who are tired of not hearing the truth of God who will begin to cry out to God to give them ministers after His heart. We must not settle for anything less than the truth of God from our pulpits. We must seek the face of God to give us courage and strength to stand up and appear as something other than gracious and winsome as we seek for preachers of truth. Without the truth of the true God, there is nothing but a false god and error to be preached.

Musings 87

September 5, 2015

One of the most obvious ways (from Romans 1:18-32) that God hardens hearts and turns men over to sin is when He hardens their hearts toward Himself and turns them over to various forms of humanism. The core aspect of sin is always in relation to God.

1. Men suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them.
2. Men exchange the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man
3. Men exchange the truth of God for a lie, and worship and serve the creature rather than the Creator
4. Men do not see fit to acknowledge God any longer
5. Men are haters of God
6. Men approve the sinful practices of others even though God hates those practices

The word “acknowledge” does not really get at the meaning of that word in its own context because a very high percentage of people acknowledge that there is a God in some way. Romans 1:28 says it like this: “And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper.” The idea is that it was not acceptable or not fitting to these people to keep God in their knowledge. It is not that these people became absolute atheists, though some probably did, but that it was not acceptable to their way of thinking to have the true God in their knowledge and so they chose other things and other ways of thinking.

That is precisely what is going on in pulpits across our land and the world today. It is far easier to preach morality and free-will than it is to preach the true and living God who is sovereign over all things including the will of men. Men should preach that men should look to God for all things and that all things come to men by grace, but that is thought to be hyper-Calvinistic by some and it is thought that the responsibility of man balances out the sovereignty of God. When it is thought that the sovereignty of God needs to be balanced out by something man has, then we can know that we have left the Bible and are heading into dangerous territory.

There are many ways that preachers do not see it fit to keep the true God in their knowledge during sermons and lectures. That is when they focus on morality and religious life without centering on the true God. That is when they may talk about God, but He is on notice to serve men if they will do certain things right. That is when men may talk about God here and there, but He is not the focus of the sermon. If God is not supreme in a sermon, then a minister is not acknowledging God as he should. When God is not the main topic of the sermon in some way, then the minister is not acknowledging the true God as he should. When God is not the goal and end of the sermon, then the minister is not acknowledging the true God as he should.

When the pulpit is not a place where God is the focus, the goal, and the chief end of the sermon, then the pulpit is not acknowledging the true God as it should. The Gospel is all about God. Sin is only seen in its hideousness and heinousness when it is seen as against God. The Lord Jesus is only seen in His glory when He is seen as the very shining forth of the glory of God. The Gospel is only seen as the Gospel when it is seen as God shining forth into the hearts of sinners to give them the light of His glory in the face of Christ. Apart from the true and living God there is no true preaching.

Now this may sound harsh to many, but in fact the actions of those who will not acknowledge God in their preaching are far harsher since they are against God. How many men stand behind pulpits and give the people moralism, legalism, and watered-down versions of the true Gospel and the true God? Being nice about this is not the way to approach it as these men are deceiving the souls of sinners and are preaching false things about the true God. Modern preaching is a judgment upon the churches of our nation and upon the nation itself. When even the preaching is a way of not acknowledging God, we can know that a famine is in the land and that God is hiding His face from us. We must repent, absolutely, but we must be given true grace from the true God to truly repent.

Musings 86

September 4, 2015

One of the most obvious ways (from Romans 1:18-32) that God hardens hearts and turns men over to sin is when He hardens their hearts toward Himself and turns them over to various forms of humanism. The core aspect of sin is always in relation to God.

1. Men suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them.
2. Men exchange the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man
3. Men exchange the truth of God for a lie, and worship and serve the creature rather than the Creator
4. Men do not see fit to acknowledge God any longer
5. Men are haters of God
6. Men approve the sinful practices of others even though God hates those practices

It would appear to some that it is an obvious sin when preachers preach for their own honor rather than the glory of God, they will still not think that their pastors do that. Even more, it is perhaps even harder to see and believe that a pastor has exchanged the truth of who God is and the truth that God has revealed for a lie. In the context this passage teaches us that God has make it known to each man who God is. The text tells us that “because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them” (Romans 1:19). Men are not ignorant of God in reality, the problem is that they hate God and suppress the truth. In suppressing the truth of God in unrighteousness these men grab hold of lies. In doing that, then, they turn from God and worship and serve the creature rather than God.

What we must understand is that man is inherently religious and men love to work for their righteousness and a standing before God based on themselves. Men do not like a sovereign God and instead want the sovereignty of their own “free-will.” Men do not like the idea that God must save them for the sake of His own name and instead want to be saved because of their own value and worth. Men don’t like the idea that they must be saved by a free-grace which is always and must always be apart from anything they can merit or work up. This glorious teaching of God saving by grace alone destroys any hope that a sinner has in self and leaves him as a vile and wretched sinner in great need of a Savior who saves sinners for the sake of God.

When man is religious and yet is involved in suppressing the truth of God, that man is turning from God and serves and worships the creature rather than God. When religious men turn from proclaiming the truth of the living God and begin to focus on man and his earthly feelings and needs, those men have turned from Christianity and are now guilty of humanism which does not worship the true God but serves the creature. What we must see is that man was created for the glory of God and to be the image of the true God in the world and was not created for himself and his own purposes. When men turn religion into something where they think that by serving men they are serving God, they have become vile idolaters. When men turn religion into something where they teach that God serves men and does what He does to benefit men, they have become vile idolaters.

Not only do men become vile idolaters, but they teach an entirely wrong view of God and the Gospel as well. God has no need of men or the service of men. God glorifies Himself through men as He pleases and has no need of men to glorify Himself. He uses men to glorify Himself by grace, but He has no need of men to do so. For some reason men think that God is focused on them and longs to do what they want in order that other men will notice Him. That is simply a horrible blasphemy despite how popular that opinion is. God lives in perfect love within Himself as triune and does not need anything or anyone other than Himself. When men try to bring this great God down in their preaching, then the men who are preaching are themselves serving the creatures and even worship the creature rather than God. Unless preaching is done out of love for God and proclaims the truth of God, it is exchanging the truth of God for a lie. Preaching can be a great, great evil rather than an expression and proclamation of the true God.

Musings 85

September 3, 2015

One of the most obvious ways (from Romans 1:18-32) that God hardens hearts and turns men over to sin is when He hardens their hearts toward Himself and turns them over to various forms of humanism. The core aspect of sin is always in relation to God.

1. Men suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them.
2. Men exchange the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man
3. Men exchange the truth of God for a lie, and worship and serve the creature rather than the Creator
4. Men do not see fit to acknowledge God any longer
5. Men are haters of God
6. Men approve the sinful practices of others even though God hates those practices

If it is a great sin for men in general, and certainly it is, to exchange the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man, then it is a far greater sin for ministers to do that in their preaching. After all, teachers and preachers will have a greater judgment. The Great Commandment is to love God with all of our being. As I Corinthians 10:31 puts it, “whether, then, you eat or drink or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.” I Peter 4 puts it directly to those who preach and teach: “Whoever speaks, is to do so as one who is speaking the utterances of God; whoever serves is to do so as one who is serving by the strength which God supplies; so that in all things God may be glorified through Jesus Christ, to whom belongs the glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.”

Preaching is not to be practical as for what it primarily is. Preaching is not to be primarily doctrinal. Preaching is not to be primarily gracious and winsome. Preaching is not meant to primarily be encouraging to men. Preaching is primarily to be to the glory of God and is to be one way that God is glorified through Jesus Christ. After all, all the glory belongs to Him forever. Preaching that does not aim at the glory of God out of love for that glory is not preaching with the proper aim and goal. Preaching that aims at the honor of the preacher, whether the preacher consciously says that or not, is idolatry. This is to say that when preaching is not an act of love for God and aimed at and meant to manifest His glory through Jesus Christ that preaching is idolatry.

While men may not intentionally aim at something which is not for the glory of God out of true love, that does not lessen their obligation to preach in light of the Great Commandment and His glory. It is a slippery slope and it appears that men slide downward in terms of their preaching. It is thought to be compassionate to preach to men in a gracious and winsome way, but that makes men the center of preaching and is a lie. It is thought that if we preach in order that men will be more moral that it is the way to preach, but in fact that is not preaching to the glory of God in the face of Christ. We can approach men in a rational way and try to reason them into the kingdom, but in fact that is not preaching to the glory of God. Preachers must get with God and bow to Him asking Him to grip their hearts with His glory and a love for Him before they try to preach.

When the preaching is not out of a heart of love for God and His glory then the hearts of the people will not be taken up with God. When the preaching has exchanged the glory of God for lesser things, then the hearts of the people will do the same thing. When the preacher, though it may be internal and not external, longs for the people to honor him rather than beholding the glory of God that preacher is an idolater and hides the glory of God from the people. The preacher has at that point exchanged the glory of God for his own glory. The preacher wants the people to honor him rather than God. The preacher wants to turn the attention of the people from God to himself. Surely it is self-evident that this is a wicked thing, yet how many sermons in our modern day are all about the preacher or all about his ability to say things or his ability to gain converts? It is not just any old form of idolatry, but it is a hideous and virtually infinite form of idolatry. It is a setting up an idol in the very face of God.

If preaching in the modern day is primarily acts of external religion and is not aimed at the glory of God, then assuredly it is no surprise that God is not visiting His people or those who claim to be His people in our day. One can almost hear Him crying out to let the gods that you are chasing save you. Let the gods that you love more than Me deliver you. What we need deliverance from; however, is the judgment of God upon us who is turning us over to ourselves. We must have God and we must have Him come to us in power or we will perish!

Musings 84

September 2, 2015

One of the most obvious ways (from Romans 1:18-32) that God hardens hearts and turns men over to sin is when He hardens their hearts toward Himself and turns them over to various forms of humanism. The core aspect of sin is always in relation to God.

1. Men suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them.
2. Men exchange the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man
3. Men exchange the truth of God for a lie, and worship and serve the creature rather than the Creator
4. Men do not see fit to acknowledge God any longer
5. Men are haters of God
6. Men approve the sinful practices of others even though God hates those practices

While the list just above sets out the major issues of God turning men over to sin in Romans 1, the most used aspect of this is regarding homosexuality. Now without denying that is clearly part of the text, I am beginning to wonder if it should apply to those in the ministry and those who are preaching as well. It seems that those who are to be preaching the Word of God are suppressing the truth of God as much as anyone else. It is hard to find a pulpit where the wonders and glories of God are set forth with energy and as if the man believes it and means it. We can ask the question, “where is God in the preaching of today” and we would have to answer that He is virtually absent. The god that is preached today is simply one who is here to meet the needs of men if they will but ask.

It appears to me that modern preaching has been for a long time (and is certainly doing it now) suppressing the truth of God in unrighteousness. It is true that a form of morality is being taught and in a few places the old doctrines are being taught, but where is God in this? Theology can be studied as an academic discipline instead of as a God-centered approach. True theology will always have God at the center and God as the subject, but it is possible to study theology as virtually a philosophy rather than as worship. True preaching has to do with God first and foremost. It has to do with the living God at all points and in all ways. True preaching is when a man of God that has been set apart by God, has been taught of God, is possessed of God and stands and declares the truths of God and His present reality. God is not just some historical fact; He is the most real of all reality.

While it is a terrible thing for men and women to suppress the truth of God in their daily lives and in their pursuits of sin, it is even more terrible for ministers in the pulpits and denominational leaders to suppress the truth of God in their ministries (so-called). Ministers are to preach about the glory of the Gospel of God and they can do nothing but suppress that truth when they do not teach and preach the true Gospel. The Gospel is all about the glory of God in the face of Christ and when men are suppressing the truth of God in the pulpits and in the teaching ministries of the churches; they are not preaching and teaching the true Gospel of the glory of God. How can one preach the Gospel of God when one is suppressing the truth of God?

It appears to be a rather common practice for men to skip over chapter 9 of Romans when they preach through that book. Why is that a common practice? True enough it may be a hard chapter. True enough it may be one that offends people. I would argue, however, that it is primarily because they want to suppress the truth of God found in that chapter. One could also argue that the God of Romans 9 makes them highly uncomfortable as well. Nevertheless, when one refuses to preach Romans 9 and the truth of God that is there one is suppressing the truth of God in unrighteousness.

There are many other places in Scripture that men suppress as well. There are many other truths that men suppress in the Bible and not just the ones about the sovereignty of God. The teaching of the nature of free-grace is also suppressed and the freeness of the Gospel of grace alone is suppressed. Men want to be in control of their own salvation and ministers want to be in control of the morality and the money of other men. In order to do those things, the truth of God must be suppressed. It is not just ministers; however, this has to do with all men. The average attendee of a local church wants to “share” his or her faith, but that seems to entail a lot of hiding and a lot of painting a rosy picture. We must not suppress the truth of God whether from the pulpit or in the average discussion about Him. It is nothing but self and self-love that keeps us from telling the truth of God. What an arrogant and proud thing it is for us to love ourselves more than the true God and the true good of others.

Free Grace 28

September 1, 2015

Nothing in man doth precede or prevent the grace of God. The light and beams of grace do dispel the clouds of our sins. Not for our sakes, but for his Name’s sake he covereth our sins. It is God’s prerogative to free us from sin by grace, and to remove them far from us. “As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us.” {Ps.103:12} He only can remove sin against whom it is committed. He only can cast sin into the depths of the sea, who hath an ocean of grace in himself, in which he swalloweth them up. John Simpson {Perfection of Justification, 1648}

Acts 8:26 But an angel of the Lord spoke to Philip saying, “Get up and go south to the road that descends from Jerusalem to Gaza.” (This is a desert road.) 27 So he got up and went; and there was an Ethiopian eunuch, a court official of Candace, queen of the Ethiopians, who was in charge of all her treasure; and he had come to Jerusalem to worship, 28 and he was returning and sitting in his chariot, and was reading the prophet Isaiah. 29 Then the Spirit said to Philip, “Go up and join this chariot.” 30 Philip ran up and heard him reading Isaiah the prophet, and said, “Do you understand what you are reading?” 31 And he said, “Well, how could I, unless someone guides me?” And he invited Philip to come up and sit with him…35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning from this Scripture he preached Jesus to him. 36 As they went along the road they came to some water; and the eunuch said, “Look! Water! What prevents me from being baptized?” 37 And Philip said, “If you believe with all your heart, you may.” And he answered and said, “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.” 38 And he ordered the chariot to stop; and they both went down into the water, Philip as well as the eunuch, and he baptized him.

From the beginning of this passage until the end we see nothing but the sovereign grace of God (free-grace) working in and through the people. Did the angel of the Lord direct Philip to the Ethiopian eunuch because of a choice of the man’s will or because of sovereign grace? What was there about the man that would have him worthy or what does the text say that the man did to earn the angel of the Lord to send Philip to meet with the man? In other words, there was nothing in the man from the evidence presented that could be thought of a something that preceded the grace of God. Yet, we can also see that nothing was able to prevent the grace of God as well. God had decided to set His grace upon this man and He did so. His grace was free of conditions and it was freely set upon the Ethiopian eunuch. The man was converted by the grace of God and that alone.

What we see from the teaching of Scripture is the work of God and nothing as far as the work of the eunuch. The man did come to Jerusalem to worship, but there is nothing meritorious about that. We see the sovereign Lord directing Philip to a specific location in order to meet this man. When Philip came to the chariot, the man was reading the Bible (Old Testament). Philip preached Christ to the man. He did not preach morality and he did not preach churchianity, but instead he preached Christ. Jesus Christ does not save anyone but by grace alone and this eunuch did not move the Lord Jesus to die for him and purchase salvation for him because he was going to go to Jerusalem, but he went to Jerusalem because Christ was sent to die for the man and. The eunuch did not earn one thing, but instead God worked it in his heart to go because there was a Divine appointment that the man needed to be at. God saved this man to the glory of His grace and He saved this man on behalf of the name of Christ.

God did not save this man because he was baptized, but instead he was told that if he believed in Christ with all of his heart he could be baptized. If the man believed in Christ, then the man was already converted. But again, behold the freeness of the grace of God. It was by His sovereign order that this man was where he was when Philip “found” him and then preached Christ to him. It was by His sovereign hand that this man had been reading Isaiah and so in some way was prepared to hear the Gospel preached to him by Philip. It was by the sovereign and free-grace of God that the man’s heart was opened so that he might hear this Gospel of Jesus Christ. It was only on account of Jesus Christ that this man’s sin could be forgiven.

Here we see an encouragement to speak to others as God may indeed open their hearts. Here we see the glory of free grace in God seeking this man out, not the man coming to God on account of his free-will. God ordained this to happen; the man did not ordain this to happen. God chose to give this man grace; the man did not choose to give himself grace. God forgave this man’s sin on behalf of Christ rather than on behalf of the will of the man. The man who was in charge of the treasure of Ethiopia now became the recipient of the riches of Christ by grace alone.

Free Grace 27

August 31, 2015

Nothing in man doth precede or prevent the grace of God. The light and beams of grace do dispel the clouds of our sins. Not for our sakes, but for his Name’s sake he covereth our sins. It is God’s prerogative to free us from sin by grace, and to remove them far from us. “As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us.” {Ps.103:12} He only can remove sin against whom it is committed. He only can cast sin into the depths of the sea, who hath an ocean of grace in himself, in which he swalloweth them up. John Simpson {Perfection of Justification, 1648}

Luke 23:32 Two others also, who were criminals, were being led away to be put to death with Him. 33 When they came to the place called The Skull, there they crucified Him and the criminals, one on the right and the other on the left…38 Now there was also an inscription above Him, “THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.” 39 One of the criminals who were hanged there was hurling abuse at Him, saying, “Are You not the Christ? Save Yourself and us!” 40 But the other answered, and rebuking him said, “Do you not even fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? 41 “And we indeed are suffering justly, for we are receiving what we deserve for our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.” 42 And he was saying, “Jesus, remember me when You come in Your kingdom!” 43 And He said to him, “Truly I say to you, today you shall be with Me in Paradise.”

When examining certain beliefs or practical teachings, it is necessary to look at the theology that drives those beliefs or teachings. If we think in terms of cause and effect, every belief has a basis for it whether the person is conscious of it or not and every practice is the same way. It may be that the underlying cause is just that the person thinks that or that is what a person has come to believe, but that can be shown to the person. But when we begin to ask what the cause of faith in the criminal who was on the cross beside Christ, we have no real explanation other than free-grace. God found that man dead in his sins and trespasses and made Him alive because of His own desire to glorify His grace. God knew that the man was by nature a child of wrath but God made Him alive and a child of His own, a child of God. The man had a dead and unbelieving heart, but God made Him alive and gave him a heart that believed. This faith came from being united to Christ.

Titus 3:5 He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit.

A person dead in sin cannot have faith in Christ while still in that sin because there is not faith apart from being united to Christ and Christ will not be united to a person dead in the filth and stench of sin. We can know, therefore, that a person must be cleansed and washed by the blood of Christ before a person can have faith. In Titus 3:5 above we see that it is in regeneration that a person is washed. This should cause the hearts of all who love Christ to leap and rejoice in His free-grace. There was nothing in them that would move God to save them, but God gave them Christ quite apart from anything they did or could do.

It is in regeneration that a soul has life and so such a soul can be a believing soul and have a true faith that flows from a union with Christ. Until a person is brought from the spiritual death of nature and given new life in Christ, there can be no living faith. Until a person is united to Christ who is life, there will be no true faith and no true life. The thief on the cross, therefore, was made alive in regeneration and his soul was washed and cleansed so that he would have faith. The thief on the cross was illuminated and the content of the words and Person of Christ were illuminated. He did not come up with a true faith in order to be saved, but instead He was regenerated and renewed I order that he might have true faith.

Can the will be free from its deadness without being made alive by free-grace? Can the will be free from its utter bondage to sin without being cleansed by Christ and in regeneration? The answers to these questions are all rather obvious when you look at it like that. What can be the cause of union with Christ and regeneration? It can only be God who does this and He can only be moved to do this by free-grace. As we look to the theology that must be true for a person to have true faith, we can only look to God and free-grace to give us those. As we look to a solid foundation on which our faith must rest, our faith either rests upon our free-will (so-called) or our faith rests upon the free-grace of our sovereign and omnipotent God. Only a faith that rests upon Him has a solid foundation.

Free Grace 26

August 27, 2015

Nothing in man doth precede or prevent the grace of God. The light and beams of grace do dispel the clouds of our sins. Not for our sakes, but for his Name’s sake he covereth our sins. It is God’s prerogative to free us from sin by grace, and to remove them far from us. “As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us.” {Ps.103:12} He only can remove sin against whom it is committed. He only can cast sin into the depths of the sea, who hath an ocean of grace in himself, in which he swalloweth them up. John Simpson {Perfection of Justification, 1648}

Luke 23:32 Two others also, who were criminals, were being led away to be put to death with Him. 33 When they came to the place called The Skull, there they crucified Him and the criminals, one on the right and the other on the left…38 Now there was also an inscription above Him, “THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.” 39 One of the criminals who were hanged there was hurling abuse at Him, saying, “Are You not the Christ? Save Yourself and us!” 40 But the other answered, and rebuking him said, “Do you not even fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? 41 “And we indeed are suffering justly, for we are receiving what we deserve for our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.” 42 And he was saying, “Jesus, remember me when You come in Your kingdom!” 43 And He said to him, “Truly I say to you, today you shall be with Me in Paradise.”

If we take a careful look at the text just above, it should strike us that the thief on the cross who was saved was saved by a free-grace that was totally apart from anything he did to move God to show him that grace. The argument that he could have just made an exercise of his free-will and made an act of faith is simply absurd in light of who this criminal was and in light of the biblical teaching on this subject. When Peter confessed Christ he was told by Christ that flesh and blood had not revealed that to him but the Father who was in heaven did this. That was why he was blessed. We simply cannot believe that the thief on the cross was blessed because he came up with the idea that Jesus was the Messiah and trusted in Him of himself.

Can the human soul make any decision for anything but out of self-love and enmity for God before it is regenerated? Any religious decision that the thief would have made before conversion would have been based on the same sinful self-love and self-centeredness that he based every decision on his whole life. This is to say that he could not have made any spiritual act toward Christ and so that act could not have moved God to save him. Not only that, but no spiritual act can move God to save a sinner either. Any spiritual act that a sinner (saved or unsaved) makes comes from God in the first place. The only thing that could have saved this thief on the cross was free-grace and nothing but free-grace.

Can the human soul have love for God before it has a regenerate heart and the Holy Spirit in it? What, then, could this soul do to move God to save it? But again, and knowingly repetitive, what decision or choice can a soul make before regeneration and apart from the fruit of the Holy Spirit that would move God to save it? The soul has nothing but enmity toward God and no love at all. How would that thief on the cross and that soul which hated God without the smallest bit of love be able to move God to save it? Can anything but free-grace save such a wretch or any wretch from the human race? Of course not, there is utterly no way. The salvation of any soul is by the free and sovereign grace of God. Why do men want to wrench some of the credit away from God? It is because they want to control their own salvation and trust in their own work of faith.

Could the will be free from its utter bondage to sin without being cleansed by Christ and in regeneration? But the will is not free and instead it is in utter bondage to sin, self, and the devil. The soul must be delivered from the bondage of sin, self, and the devil before it could even possibly be thought to be free, though of course the will is never free from its mind, nature, and affections. It is the soul as a whole that must be made free before any soul would love God. There must be a new nature before there can be a new love. The love for self and sin as a reigning principle must be taken away and the love of God must dwell in the soul. This is to say, once again, there is nothing that can precede and there is nothing or prevent the grace of God. The true and living God cannot be moved apart from Himself to save sinners. God saves sinners to the glory of His name and based on the work of Christ that He was sent to do and carried out for the glory of God. Sinners must die to self and look to Christ alone. This dying to self and looking to Christ alone is something that only free-grace can do. The thief couldn’t do it.

Free Grace 25

August 26, 2015

Nothing in man doth precede or prevent the grace of God. The light and beams of grace do dispel the clouds of our sins. Not for our sakes, but for his Name’s sake he covereth our sins. It is God’s prerogative to free us from sin by grace, and to remove them far from us. “As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us.” {Ps.103:12} He only can remove sin against whom it is committed. He only can cast sin into the depths of the sea, who hath an ocean of grace in himself, in which he swalloweth them up. John Simpson {Perfection of Justification, 1648}

Luke 23:32 Two others also, who were criminals, were being led away to be put to death with Him. 33 When they came to the place called The Skull, there they crucified Him and the criminals, one on the right and the other on the left…38 Now there was also an inscription above Him, “THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.” 39 One of the criminals who were hanged there was hurling abuse at Him, saying, “Are You not the Christ? Save Yourself and us!” 40 But the other answered, and rebuking him said, “Do you not even fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? 41 “And we indeed are suffering justly, for we are receiving what we deserve for our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.” 42 And he was saying, “Jesus, remember me when You come in Your kingdom!” 43 And He said to him, “Truly I say to you, today you shall be with Me in Paradise.”

In the last posting (Free Grace 34) I tried to point out that there is nothing but free-grace that could save this man as there was utterly nothing else that could be argued as to why this man was converted. But of course there is one thing that can be argued, though I don’t think that it is a real argument at all. Some would argue that the man simply made a choice of his own free-will and so God saved the man because he had faith. Perhaps one could even say that the vast majority of people who say they believe the Bible and the Gospel in our day would make that argument. I can only say that it is a terrible argument to make as it makes faith out to be a work and so the criminal is then said to have saved himself by one work, or at least contributed to his own salvation by that one work.

We can respond by simply asking those people where that faith came from (God’s gift or man’s work) and what is the biblical teaching on what is the purpose of faith. While this has been dealt with previously, it is good to look at it from a real life example and especially a biblical example. What would move God to save this man because the man came up with faith? What is it about faith that would make it of such a quality thing that it would move God to save the sinner who comes up with it? God demands perfection in salvation and as such there is no righteousness acceptable to Him but that of Christ. So can a man come up with a perfect faith and as a result of that one perfect act of faith God is moved to save the man? How can this be?

We must look at this and think through this issue. If there is a faith that can come from a human being that can come from the human being apart from grace, which clearly a will that is free is free of grace, then that human being is not saved by Christ alone and is not saved by grace alone. If a human being is partially saved or can do something to move God to save him that another does not do, then the doctrine of election is overthrown and man is sovereign. Of course the very concept of a will that is free also implies that the will is free of sin or free of depravity at that point to. If the will is not totally free of depravity at the point of faith, then how can the act of faith move God to save the sinner? If the will is free, then it is not only free of depravity and of grace but also of the regenerating power of God.

We must fight to our dying breaths the notion that sinners are saved in some way other than sheer and perfect free-grace. Sinners are saved and sanctified based on the glory of God in Christ and that alone. There are no other reasons than God for why sinners are saved and sanctified. If we are not saved and sanctified by free-grace, then we are saved and sanctified by grace plus something we do. As we look at the thief on the cross who was crucified for his crimes and yet saved by free-grace alone, we must know that this is the pattern and the only way anyone can be saved and sanctified. We will always look to Christ alone and grace alone or we will look to self in some way to move God on our behalf. God can only be moved by His own name and glory and the name of Christ. If He is moved by another, then He is no longer holy. We give up free-grace at a terrible price.

Free Grace 24

August 25, 2015

Nothing in man doth precede or prevent the grace of God. The light and beams of grace do dispel the clouds of our sins. Not for our sakes, but for his Name’s sake he covereth our sins. It is God’s prerogative to free us from sin by grace, and to remove them far from us. “As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us.” {Ps.103:12} He only can remove sin against whom it is committed. He only can cast sin into the depths of the sea, who hath an ocean of grace in himself, in which he swalloweth them up. John Simpson {Perfection of Justification, 1648}

Luke 23:32 Two others also, who were criminals, were being led away to be put to death with Him. 33 When they came to the place called The Skull, there they crucified Him and the criminals, one on the right and the other on the left…38 Now there was also an inscription above Him, “THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.” 39 One of the criminals who were hanged there was hurling abuse at Him, saying, “Are You not the Christ? Save Yourself and us!” 40 But the other answered, and rebuking him said, “Do you not even fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? 41 “And we indeed are suffering justly, for we are receiving what we deserve for our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.” 42 And he was saying, “Jesus, remember me when You come in Your kingdom!” 43 And He said to him, “Truly I say to you, today you shall be with Me in Paradise.”

In considering the conversion and death of the criminal who was crucified with Jesus, we again look for what would have moved God to save the criminal. Matthew 27:44 says that both robbers were insulting Him. What we have, then, is a man who was a criminal and is said to have been a robber. We don’t know if he assaulted his victims or even killed some, but he was a criminal and a robber. While this man was on the cross he was insulting Jesus and mocking Him. This man was born dead in sins and trespasses and it would appear that he had been given over to sin during his life and appeared to be a fairly hardened sinner.

There can be no doubt at all in this case that there was nothing in this man and there was nothing that this man did to move God to save him. This man was a sinner by nature and a sinner by practice. He was not even an outwardly good man. Even after he was nailed to a cross himself he mocked and insulted the Lord Jesus. Was there anything at all that could have moved God to save him? One could argue that he still had free-will and so he chose to be saved. In light of the teachings of Scripture as a whole, we know that argument is simply impossible. A hardened criminal will not confess his sin unless by grace God opens his eyes to his sin. We know that Peter was told when he confessed Christ that he was blessed because flesh and blood had not shown that to him but the Father who is in heaven had taught him that. The criminal had nothing in him to move God to open his eyes to his sin and then to show him something of the glories of Christ.

How could this hardened criminal know who Jesus was apart from having his eyes opened and being taught this by God? How could this criminal have such a change of heart apart from his heart being changed? How could this criminal who was a hater of Christ and mocked Christ now turn to the Lord Jesus who was also hanging on a cross and ask Him to remember him when He (Jesus) came into His kingdom? The free-grace of God is our only answer to the questions. This criminal stood and stands as an example and wonder of free-grace. There is absolutely nothing good that could be said about this man and there is nothing that could make him more savable than any other, though in the eyes of moralists there may have been some who were worse. Behold the free-grace of God in Christ Jesus that saves sinners despite who they are and what they are and makes them trophies of Divine grace!

We can see how this man was brought to a realization of his own sin and what that sin deserved. We can see how he went from enmity toward Jesus to faith and submission to the Lord Jesus. We can see that he trusted in nothing of himself but simply looked to Christ, but not just looked to any Christ but he was looking to Christ who was on the cross and being crucified before his very eyes. God had to have opened his eyes to see that this Jesus was indeed the King of the Jews. This criminal went from mocking Jesus about that to believing Christ was the true King in an eternal kingdom and that while Christ was being crucified as a criminal. If a person cannot at least see the concept of free-grace in this, that person has a hardened heart. But for the rest, behold the wonder, glory, and beauty of free-grace! Behold the loveliness of a thrice holy God who saves sinners through Christ because of who He is and not for anything found in us sinners. Look to this free-grace alone and ask God to show you the nature of free-grace and the workings of free-grace. This free-grace will work in your heart to show you your sin, subdue your heart to Christ, and then give you a new heart and all of that quite apart from what you deserve. This grace has no cause found in you, but all is found in Him and His love for His own name and glory.