Calvinism and Arminianism 27

January 5, 2015

One of the greatest differences between the evangelical Calvinists and those they deride as “Hyper-calvinists,” is the evangelical Calvinists believe Arminians and Pelagians are otherwise sound “Christians,” and refer to them as their brothers and sisters. The Hyper-calvinists believe that as long as one is unconverted from his natural freewill state by the operation of the Spirit of God, and converted to the free grace of God by the Gospel of the grace of God, there is insufficient evidence to consider such as a “Christian,” or a “brother or sister.”

“This false idea of ‘free-will’ is a real threat to salvation, and a delusion fraught with the most perilous consequences” (Luther).

“Till you feel yourself in this extremity of weakness, you are not in a condition (if I may say so) to receive the heavenly help. Your idea of remaining ability is the very thing that repels the help of the Spirit, just as any idea of remaining goodness thrusts away the propitiation of the Savior. It is your not seeing that you have no strength that is keeping you from believing” (Pink).

In the quotes above, Luther, Pink, and the top quote get at the real issue. If it is true that a person that believes in the free-will regarding salvation is in a “natural freewill state” and the opposite of that is a state of grace, then we must see that the doctrine of “free-will” is not just a slight error, but instead is at the heart of the Gospel. If Luther was correct about the false idea of “free-will” being a real threat to salvation, then we must not be so squeamish about standing for the Gospel being a change from free-will to free-grace. If it is true that our idea of remaining ability is the very think that repels the work of the Spirit, then we must wake up and realize that those who teach free-will and those who do not openly and strongly oppose it are not teaching the Gospel of grace alone in truth. One cannot teach the Gospel of grace alone in truth apart from teaching the inability of man in all things spiritual and the Spirit as regenerating dead sinners as He pleases apart from anything they can do to assist.

The doctrine of man’s inability is not just some creedal statement that can be safely ignored, but instead it is at the heart of the Gospel of grace alone. To the degree that man has ability in the spiritual realm is the degree that the Gospel is not of grace alone. Romans 11:6 speaks to this with great clarity. “But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace is no longer grace.” Grace must stand alone or it is no longer grace. Anything the will can do (apart from grace) as a response to an invitation or command is an act in obedience to the Law and as such is a work. But we are told that the souls are justified apart from works of the Law and by grace alone. The doctrine of justification by grace alone will not stand with the action of a free-will that operates in its own strength and is moved to act by a command or God to believe. That is, without a real question, a work of the flesh/Law.

The teaching of free-will is a real threat to the Gospel precisely because it keeps men from being humbled beyond all their own powers and looking to grace alone. Instead of that, it keeps men looking to themselves for an act that God will respond to in order to save the soul. This is very dangerous to the Gospel of grace alone. When men think that Arminian teaching on free-will does not at the least have a danger of perilous consequences, it may be the case that they don’t understand that the Gospel of grace alone does not allow for a person to exercise a free-will because that is a work of the flesh. The act or choice of the will that is free of grace, which the will must be in order to be free, is an act or choice of the flesh and as such it depends on an act of the flesh rather than grace. That is not a Gospel of grace alone.

The error of teaching that depends on free-will does indeed have perilous consequences. We must see these differences and instead of trying to be gracious and winsome to those who differ from us on things we don’t see as a necessity, we must try to show them that their depending on the free-will is a deviation from the Gospel of grace alone. Scripture sets out for us so clearly that sinners are saved by grace alone and yet the free-will position (either actual position or tolerance for it) will not allow for a Gospel of grace alone. The Scripture is so clear that God saves sinners to the glory of His grace and not the glory of His grace and man’s free-will. God will not share His glory with another and He will not share the glory of the Gospel of grace alone with the supposed free-will of men. Modern preachers (whether professing Reformed or Arminian) point men to make choices when they should point men to God and His grace alone. Men must receive all from God and not trust in themselves at all.

John Traske on Love

January 4, 2015

No man can truly say he doth love his brother until he hath trial of his own love; neither may believers say, without vain ostentation in saying so; but yet may they perceive that others do so, preferring others to themselves, and that of I Jn.3:14, {“we know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death,”} is to be understood of the mutual love that is in believers one towards another. And though some may say that they do love the brethren, yet like Joab take them by the beard with one hand, and ask how they do, and let out their bowels with the other; {II Sam.20:9,10;} just as he that slanders the Lord’s children doth; who pretends love to them, and yet exposes them to everlasting reproach by his devilish lies. And who can truly say that he so loves the brethren as he ought, and as Christ commands, not knowing whether he can lay down his life for them as Christ did. {Jn.15:12,13, Eph.5:1, I Jn.3:16} This was only urged to show the vanity of that common mark of faith taken from I Jn.3:14 – {“We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death;”} which neither can be an infallible mark, but as it can be directly proved to proceed from faith; and the Apostle contrasts the love of the brethren one to another, as a sign of their translation from death to life against the wonder at the hatred of the world, vs.13. {“Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you.”} And such is the nature of true faith, that it carries the creature so out of its own love, and all; as that it pitches it upon Christ’s only love; neither do true believers ever boast of their love, for faith excludes all such boasting. And yet they rejoice to see the love of others, and do prefer it to their own; they press so to perfection in love, that want of love, and the rest of those fruits, being their daily just complaint of themselves, though they question not the favor of God for that; nor are not infallibly assured by it at all; sometimes sensible they may assure their hearts so before God; but their infallible assurance is only by faith in Christ. {Heb.10:22, I Jn.3:14, 19} John Traske  (Taken from http://www.supralapsarian.com/)

Gilbert Beebe on Prayer 5

January 3, 2015

The humblest and most simple expression of desire that comes welling up from a broken and contrite heart, is far better than the most eloquent flow of words that charm the carnal ears of men; for the sacrifice of a broken and contrite spirit God will not despise. — In our secret prayers, when alone in our closet, that is, when the world is shut out from our mind, and there is none but God can hear, and we feel that our devotion is a personal matter between the trembling suppliant and his God, we use the personal pronouns in their singular form; as, ‘my God,’ why hast thou forsaken me? God be merciful ‘to me;’ ‘hear me;’ ‘deliver me,’ &c. Whether upon our knees, prostrate on the ground, or upon our beds, or even when our hands are engaged in labor, by night or day, when our heart is drawn out to God in the secret aspirations of the heart, we pray with the spirit and the understanding, even when our lips are sealed in silence. We cannot suppress the secret desire inwrought by the Spirit, and involuntarily arising from the depth of our heart to God as the Giver of every good and perfect gift; and from a deep sense of our own vileness, every ejaculation is presented in the name of Jesus, with a full conviction that we can approach God in no other name. The apostle Peter reminds us that the end of all things is at hand, and admonishes us therefore to “be sober, and watch unto prayer.” {I Peter iv. 7} What Jesus our Lord has said unto one, he also says unto all his dear saints, “Watch.” “Watch and pray, lest ye enter into temptation.” In a careful, vigilant watching, we cannot fail to find abundant incentives to prayer; and if our watching does not have the effect to incline us to pray, it must be that we are in the sad condition of those saints of whom Peter speaks, {I Peter i. 9,} who having neglected the admonition given at that chapter, are blind, cannot see afar off, and have forgotten that they have been purged from their old sins. — In conclusion of this already lengthy article, we wish to say to those who have been exercised upon the subject and who have requested to write upon this important subject; you cannot be too poor, too needy, or too unworthy to call upon the name of the Lord. It is especially for those of just your description of character that God has provided the new and living way, which he has consecrated for all who, being humbled under his mighty hand, do feel their need of his mercy and grace. It is the poor that he filleth with good things, while the rich he sends empty away. — “Blest are the humble souls that see, Their emptiness and poverty; Treasures of grace to them are given, And crowns of joy laid up in heaven.” Gilbert Beebe, Signs of the Times, Editorial. {Volume 47, Middletown, NY, January 1, 1879.}   (Taken from http://www.supralapsarian.com/)

Gilbert Beebe on Prayer 4

January 2, 2015

The subject of prayer opens before us so wide a field for meditation, that we cannot, we know not where to stop when dwelling on the subject. Our principal object in this article is to relieve, so far as we may be enabled, some trembling ones who, from a sense of unworthiness, and of inability to order their speech aright before the Lord, have been sorely tempted to doubt their right to pray, and fear that its sinful for them to attempt it; we have labored to show that such are the very ones that are the most welcome to approach the awful Majesty of God in prayer and supplication. They come not in their own name, but in the all-prevailing name of him who forever liveth to make intercession for them and in them. — Prayer, as a mere duty, is a very dull and unavailing employment, yet it is a duty devolving on all who feel their need of Divine favor, because Christ has enjoined it upon them; but when led by the Spirit to the throne of grace, it is a most delightful privilege. Poor, weak and worthless as we are in and of ourselves, yet, “Sprinkled with reconciling blood, they may approach the throne of God,” and not be consumed; because the name of Jesus Christ, their Advocate with the Father, is upon them, and has sealed them with the Holy Spirit of promise. {Eph. i. 13} In prayer we are permitted to hold communion with God, through our High Priest, from over the mercy-seat. The apostle speaks {Eph. vi. 18} of “praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit,” &c; from which we infer that the apostolic practice of social as well as private prayer is to be perpetuated in the church of God until time shall be no more. — In social prayer, one is mouth for all who are present and qualified by the Spirit to unite in the devotion. If the saints who meet for prayer are, like the primitive saints, all of one heart and one mind, and all are led by the one spirit, there will be no discord, nor confusion, and the prayer expressed in words by him who is mouth for all will be equally the prayer of all. In social prayer we use the plural form of the personal pronouns, ‘our,’ ‘us,’ &c., as taught; {Matt. vi. 9-13;} this is proper, because it is the prayer of all who in their hearts can say, Amen. We have many instances recorded of the saints meeting for prayer, and the practice should be continued in the church of God. When Herod the king had killed James with a sword, and had imprisoned Peter also, intending also to deliver him unto death, many were gathered together praying; and their prayers were graciously heard and answered. {Acts xii. 1-19} We have many other accounts of the meeting of the primitive saints at places where prayer was wont to be made; and should not the saints of the present age walk in the footsteps of the early Christians? — But in social or public prayers, we should carefully avoid all ostentatious display, or effort to elicit the admiration and praise of men. Be not like those who pray to be heard and admired by men; nor should we use vain repetitions, for that is forbidden. Our words should be few; for God is high in the heavens, and we are on the earth. It is not becoming in ministers, while assaying to lead in public or social prayer, to presume to explain or expound anything to the Lord; for he needs no logic or explanation from us, and our prayers are to comprise supplication, intercession and thanksgiving, under a full conviction that the Lord knoweth all about us, that he searches the hearts and tries the reins of all, and with a solemn consciousness that all things are naked and open to his all-seeing eyes. In our public or social prayers, our wandering thoughts are prone to seek the applause of those who are present, and almost forget that we are professedly addressing the God whose dwelling is in the heavens, and from whose sight the inmost secrets of our heart cannot be concealed. The cruel tempter is ever ready to divert our mind from the awful solemnity of holding communion with the eternal God. How cold and dull and formal are our prayers when thus yielding to the carnal impulse of our fleshly nature and the temptation of the adversary; our pride and vain ambition are either inflated or mortified, as we have succeeded or failed to make a display. One would hardly believe Christians could be troubled in this way; but they are the only class that are really troubled on this account. Carnal professors and self-righteous Pharisees feel perfectly satisfied with their prayers if they can secure the applause of men; but those who are taught of God feel and lament the imperfection of their most solemn devotions, for they feel deeply their short-comings; and were it not for the blessed assurance that the Spirit helpeth their infirmities, supplying the ability which they lack, and making intercession for them according to the will of God, they would not dare to take the sacred name of God upon their lips in prayer or praise. —

Gilbert Beebe on Prayer 3

January 1, 2015

The subject of prayer opens before us a boundless theme for serious reflection. The God to whom prayer is to be made is the “high and lofty One that inhabits eternity, and his name is Holy.” He is “of purer eyes than to behold evil, and cannot look on iniquity.” Yet in the amazing riches of his grace he has provided a way of access through Jesus Christ, the one and only Mediator between God and men, whereby his children may approach him, and come even unto his seat, and not be consumed. Most truly, Jesus Christ is the Way, and the Truth, and the Life, and no man can come unto the Father but by him. {John xiv. 6} Our prayers to be acceptable to God must be presented in his name, for there is no other name under heaven given among men whereby we must or can be saved; and he has instructed us to address all our prayers to the Father, in the name of Jesus Christ the Son, and as indited by the Holy Spirit. This rule should be strictly observed when we approach the throne of grace. It is true that these three are One, but officially to be regarded in our prayers, as Jesus has commanded us. By the Spirit we address the eternal God, as “our Father which is in heaven,” whose name is hallowed; and we find access to him through his Son, in whom dwells all the fulness of the Godhead bodily, whom the Father has given to be the Head over all to the church, which is his body, and the fullness of him that filleth all in all; and in whose sacred Sonship is treasured the sonship, heirship, wisdom, righteousness, sanctification and redemption, with every other spiritual blessing of all his members, and their eternal, vital union is securely treasured up in Him. Therefore when we pray we should ask our petitions of the Father in his name, as taught by his Holy Spirit. Thus the “Three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost,” are recognized in our spiritual devotion. While we call upon God, as our Father, this relationship is in and through Jesus Christ his Son, who by the gift of the Father is our Head, and officially our Mediator, in whom alone we stand accepted. The Holy Spirit which is given us, while one with the Father and the Son, is officially our Comforter, our Teacher, and the gracious, infallible Prompter of our prayers. Every prayer, therefore, to be acceptable to God, must be addressed to the Father, in the name of Jesus Christ our Mediator; for in no other name or way can we have access unto God. The new and living way unto the Father, which is consecrated for us, is through the vail; that is to say, through the flesh of him who was made flesh and dwelt among us; whose glory we beheld, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. How frequently Jesus informed his disciples that after his resurrection and ascension to his Mediatorial throne, they should address all their prayers to the Father in his name, “and in that day ye shall ask me nothing. Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you. Hitherto have ye asked nothing in my name; ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be full.” {John xvi. 23, 24} “And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye shall ask anything in my name, I will do it.” {John xiv. 12-14} The privilege of asking in his name belongs exclusively to those who are embraced in his name; as all the members of a man’s body are included in his name, and as a wife is in the name of her husband, and as children are legally included in the name of their paternal parents, so the church of God, as the Lamb’s wife, and all her members, are members of his body, and covered by his name; and as his seed, or children, his name is their inheritance, and their approach unto God in his name implies a vital relationship to him; and his name is to them a strong tower, and perfect indemnity for all they need for time or for eternity. And the Holy Comforter shall lead them into all truth; for he shall take of the things of Jesus and show them unto them. This Spirit shall make intercession for them and in them, according to the will of God. Hence the gracious assurance is given, that whatsoever they are moved by the Holy Spirit to ask in the name of Christ shall be given them; for the Spirit will not lead them to ask for anything contrary to the mind and will of God. And as none can call Jesus Lord but by the Holy Ghost, so none can pray in his name but by the same Spirit. An inspired apostle has assured us that all our necessities are known and amply provided for by our heavenly Father. “But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.” {Phil. iv. 19} But as we have not wisdom to discriminate between our need and what our carnal mind may crave, the blessed Spirit maketh intercession for us, withholding only what would be hurtful to us, and incompatible with the righteous will of God; for he will withhold no good thing from them who walk uprightly. —

Gilbert Beebe on Prayer 2

December 31, 2014

“For we know not how to pray as we ought,” nor can we learn from all the prayer books ever published, or by any lessons taught by good or bad men. It is only the Spirit that can search or know what is the mind of God, or make intercession for the saints according to the will of God. The spirit of our flesh would ask that God would yield to our carnal desires; but the Spirit of God teaches us to say, “not our will, but thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven,” and to ask for grace to reconcile us in all things to God. — The Spirit of our God will never lead to pray for or desire that God should grant us anything more or less than what he has in store for us; and when we pray for the gratification of our carnal desires, we surely pray amiss, and it will neither be for our good or his glory, and therefore he graciously denies our requests. The saints are instructed to pray without ceasing, and in all things to give thanks. We do not understand this injunction to mean that all our time is to be devoted exclusively to a form of prayer, for vain repetitions in prayer are forbidden; but at all times in our heart to breathe forth our desire to God to preserve us from evil, and lead us by his counsel and wisdom in all things. There is no place or period of our pilgrimage when we can say our prayers are ended, or that we can cease to call upon the name of the Lord. And in all things, whether agreeable or painful to us, we are to give thanks to God. — The peculiar trials which are experienced by God’s praying children, when their prayers seem to be unheard, and they feel as though they were sinking in deep waters of sore affliction, should not lead them to conclude that God’s ear has become heavy that he cannot or will not hear them; for he often withholds the answer to our prayers for the trial of our faith and patience, and that we may the better understand and more fully appreciate the blessings when received. Our blessed Lord spake a parable of the unjust judge and importuning widow, “to this end, that men ought always to pray, and not to faint.” {Luke xviii. 1-5} A sense of our abject poverty and utter unworthiness should not cause us to faint, or despair of the mercy of the Lord, for it is the poor, humble, contrite, laboring, heavy laden child that God has made welcome to come boldly to his throne of grace in their Redeemer’s Name; and the promise is that they shall obtain mercy, and find grace to help in every time of need; but the rich, self-righteous, he sends empty away. The poor publican, bowed down under a sense of unworthiness to even raise his eyes to heaven, in deep contrition smites upon his breast, and the hidden anguish of his heart in trembling accents cries, “God, be merciful to me;” and to this last petition he signs his name and character, “a sinner.” He does not claim to be a saint, nor indulge a thought that his sad prayer is meritorious. If God shuts out his prayer, and spurns him from his presence, he feels in his heart that God is just. But with fear and trembling he feels that this is his last, his only hope; for if God withholds from him his mercy, he sinks in hopeless despair. But O, what wondrous grace! His prayer is heard, and he is justified rather than the boasting Pharisee. — There are times with some who have hoped in the Lord, when they have had so deep a sense of the infinite majesty and holiness of God, and so deep a sense of their own pollution, as, like the publican, to stand afar off, and because they dare not to lift up their eyes to heaven, or take the sacred name of God upon their lips, have concluded that they have not, cannot pray; when perhaps in no part of their experience have they in reality and truth prayed more, or with greater acceptance. Their prayers have not been formed into words, nor articulated with their voice, but from the deepest recesses of their aching heart the pent up ejaculation has in unutterable groanings, in heaving sighs and flowing tears, expressed the desire and confession, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner.” —

Gilbert Beebe on Prayer 1

December 30, 2014

Few subjects, perhaps, have occasioned greater concern in the minds of the children of God than that of prayer; and it is indeed, when rightly understood, a comforting thought that the living children of God are more seriously tried upon this subject than any other people. Indeed, we do not know that any other people have any trouble at all in regard to prayer. The Pharisee who stood and prayed with himself, and paraded before the Lord what he evidently regarded as his own good works and self-esteem, had not a single petition to ask of God, and being full of self-righteousness, betrayed no doubt or fear that his prayer was meritorious in the sight of God. The parable of the Pharisee and Publican was spoken by our Lord unto certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others, {Luke xviii. 9-14,} and it is applicable to all self-righteous Pharisees, whether of ancient or modern times.

The ease and fluency in which all self-righteous persons can read or recite what they call their prayers, is very observable. They profess to regard it as a duty to do a certain amount of praying; and when they have read or repeated their task, they can say, with the strange woman described in Proverbs vii. 14, “I have peace offerings with me; this day have I paid my vows.” Of this class of will-worshipers, not a few are like their ancient brethren, fond of being heard in their devotions; they choose the corners of streets, or market places, or places where they may be heard of men, that all may see how devout and righteous they are. They think, as we are told, that they shall be heard for their much speaking, and therefore make long prayers, and use vain repetitious; but our Lord has said of them, “this people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me; but in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.” {Matt. xv. 8,9} — It is not then the fluency of speech, the eloquence of language, nor readiness to engage in public or in private prayer, that God will accept as worship. Nor is it a periodical appropriation of times in which to go through the form of prayer, for the spirit of grace and supplication are not at our command. In his sermon on the mount, our Savior forbid his disciples praying as the hypocrites do, or using vain repetitions, as the heathen do. “Be not ye therefore like unto them; for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of, before ye ask him.”

Even the repetition of the form of prayer which Jesus taught his disciples, {Matt. vi. 9-13,} becomes with us vain and forbidden repetition when we are not led by the Spirit to pray with the spirit and with the understanding. How many of us have been taught from our infancy to commit to memory what is called the Lord’s prayer, and to repeat it, as though by so doing we could secure the mercy and protection of the Lord. It is used as a kind of charm, to keep evil from us when we lie down to sleep, and we have felt as though we have secured the favor of the Lord; when not a word has been felt in or uttered from our heart. Even the saints of God, including the apostles of the Lamb, have asked in prayer of God and received not, because they have asked amiss. We may rest assured that we have asked amiss, if God withholds from us that which we ask for; and this is a great mercy to us, that he does withhold those things which his Spirit has not made intercession for. “Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities; for we know not what we should pray for as we ought; but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered; and he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God.” {Rom. viii. 26,27} Our Savior said to the woman of Samaria, “God is a Spirit; and they that worship him must worship in spirit and in truth.” {John iv. 24}.

The experience of the saints is in harmony with the last two references, especially when they feel their heart drawn out in prayer to God. When they remember that God is a Spirit, infinite and eternal, the inquiry from their heart arises, “wherewith shall I come before the LORD, and bow myself before the High God?” {Micah vi. 6} They know they cannot approach him with a price in their hand, or with any offerings they can bring. How often in their heart, the unuttered and unutterable desire is hidden, “O that I knew where I might find him!” They may bend their knees to the ground, but their lips are sealed; they perhaps cannot utter a word, a syllable, and they sometimes even fear that they have offended God by their very attempt to pray. How sensibly do they now feel their weakness, and in deep humility they groan in spirit, in inexpressible breathings of desire. This is prayer, and this prayer enters the ears of the God of Sabaoth. And this prayer God has promised to hear, for he has said, “when the poor and needy seek water, and there is none, and their tongue faileth for thirst, I the LORD will hear them, I the God of Israel will not forsake them.” {Isa. xli. 17} This is truly helping their infirmity. Their tongue has failed; it can utter no sound, it cannot express the deeply hidden groaning for the water of life which is felt within. No created ear can hear the silent emotions that rend their broken hearts; the deep contrition that overwhelms them in unspeakable anguish can be heard only by their gracious prayer hearing God. “I the Lord will hear them.” What heavenly consolation is found in these gracious words. The heavens had seemed to them like brass, and the earth as dust, and their prayers had seemed utterly unavailing, and shut out from the ear of Sovereign Mercy. A consciousness not only of infirmity, but also a sense of guilt and unworthiness had paralyzed their tongue; but their inability to articulate with their tongue cannot prevent him, who searches the hearts and trieth the reins of the children of men, from hearing the prayer which his own Spirit has indited in the heart, and no other prayer than that which his Spirit indites will be accepted, though uttered in thunder-tones.

Calvinism and Arminianism 26

December 29, 2014

One of the greatest differences between the evangelical Calvinists and those they deride as “Hyper-calvinists,” is the evangelical Calvinists believe Arminians and Pelagians are otherwise sound “Christians,” and refer to them as their brothers and sisters. The Hyper-calvinists believe that as long as one is unconverted from his natural freewill state by the operation of the Spirit of God, and converted to the free grace of God by the Gospel of the grace of God, there is insufficient evidence to consider such as a “Christian,” or a “brother or sister.”

“This false idea of ‘free-will’ is a real threat to salvation, and a delusion fraught with the most perilous consequences” (Luther).

“Till you feel yourself in this extremity of weakness, you are not in a condition (if I may say so) to receive the heavenly help. Your idea of remaining ability is the very thing that repels the help of the Spirit, just as any idea of remaining goodness thrusts away the propitiation of the Savior. It is your not seeing that you have no strength that is keeping you from believing” (Pink).

If the three quotes from above are taken as accurately representing the state of man in his depravity and inability and the absolute need for the grace of God to work alone and unaided, we can see that Luther is correct and that idea of ‘free-will’ is indeed a threat to salvation and is a delusion (deception of the devil) that has the most perilous of consequences. Each soul hangs upon a slender thread over the pit of hell and it cannot look to its own will for help in the matter, but instead it must look to grace alone for help.

As long as people look to their ‘free-will’ for help, they are not looking to anything that can help. Instead of looking to Christ alone by grace alone for the only true help for the soul, the attention of these people is diverted by looking to themselves and the ability of their own wills. This is a great danger. It is looking from the only real power (Christ and His grace) that can help to that which has no power or ability to help at all. Not only does the will not have any ability or power or life to help, by looking to it and trusting in the delusion of help it offers one is trusting in something that keeps them from looking to what can bring real help.

The doctrine of ‘free-will’ is not just a doctrine as such, but when people believe that they have such a will that has power to believe in Christ, they will wait until the last moment or a moment of their own choosing to be saved. Instead of seeking the Lord who gives grace as He pleases and to whom He pleases, they look to themselves to be saved as they please and when they are pleased. This is as antithetical to the Gospel of Jesus Christ and free-grace alone as one can get. The soul that looks to its own will is in reality looking to its own will to apply grace to itself instead of looking to God alone who can give grace. This should show us that the ‘free-will’ teaching is in reality opposed to the truth of ‘free-grace’ and that there is no ground at all in the middle between the two. It is either ‘free-will’ alone or it is free-grace alone. It is either the sovereignty of the will or the sovereignty of God.

The two beliefs are really like the tips of icebergs that have a lot below the surface. The two tips cannot come together because of a lot of other things below the surface. These two systems of belief cannot be reconciled and it is simply and plainly one or the other. The glorious reality of justification by grace alone will not allow one single act of the “free-will” as that would be a work and a “free-will” cannot admit of a free-grace which saves as it pleases apart from any and all works of men. But again, these two are as opposite to each other as fire and water. You cannot have a large amount of both in the same place at the same time.

It is true that we live in a day where people are always trying to reconcile beliefs and belief systems, and for some reason many are trying to reconcile ‘free-will’ and free-grace. While the efforts of many nice, gracious, and winsome people are aimed at doing this very thing, the only reconciliation with God is when a person is translated from a ‘free-will’ (based on the work of self) system to free-grace (based on the work of God). But again, the two beliefs are at the heads (so to speak) of two belief systems and the two beliefs cannot be reconciled to each other without demolishing the belief systems that they are built on. Both cannot be true despite all the efforts of modern Erasmus’ to do so. It is when people prefer a unity built on a house of cards rather than truth that these things are thought to be accomplished. How we need a new Reformation in our day!

Calvinism and Arminianism 25

December 28, 2014

One of the greatest differences between the evangelical Calvinists and those they deride as “Hyper-calvinists,” is the evangelical Calvinists believe Arminians and Pelagians are otherwise sound “Christians,” and refer to them as their brothers and sisters. The Hyper-calvinists believe that as long as one is unconverted from his natural freewill state by the operation of the Spirit of God, and converted to the free grace of God by the Gospel of the grace of God, there is insufficient evidence to consider such as a “Christian,” or a “brother or sister.” This is not to say that they consign them to hell–that is not their desire, for by their own experience they understand that before that gracious divine call out of darkness, they, too, were “vessels of wrath even as others.” Arminians and Pelagians are as much in need for the gospel as any “heathen” or pagan. Calvinists would do well to “evangelize” their Arminian or Pelagian “brothers and sisters.”

“Till you feel yourself in this extremity of weakness, you are not in a condition (if I may say so) to receive the heavenly help. Your idea of remaining ability is the very thing that repels the help of the Spirit, just as any idea of remaining goodness thrusts away the propitiation of the Savior. It is your not seeing that you have no strength that is keeping you from believing” (Pink).

The idea of “free-will” sounds so attractive to the natural man and it seems to relieve the tension of many problems, but that is only apparent. Why does this sound or appear so attractive to the natural man? Because it makes it appear that men are not totally dead in sin and that the time and the final choice of salvation is left up to them. The natural man cannot seem to reconcile that the Bible has many commands to man with the teaching that man has no ability to keep the commands. But the natural man wants to be in control and to decide things for himself. The natural man wants to do things according to his own reason and power. However, as Pink shows in the quote above, until a person comes to see just how weak s/he is, which is to say that we have no strength at all, the idea of having ability repels the work of the Holy Spirit and of the Great Physician. The idea that man has even just a little goodness will keep Christ away and when Christ is kept away His propitiatory work is kept away.

Luther was so clear that until a man arrived at the point of utter helplessness and gave up any hope in his own will he was not ready for salvation. Pink makes the same point when he says that it is man’s not seeing that he has no strength at all that keeps him from believing. The idea of man’s utter inability is not attractive to unregenerate sinners, but it is an important teaching that the true teaching of justification by faith alone is built on. It is what proud sinners need to come to an understanding of and to arrive at a “felt” awareness of it. This is not to say that they must have high and exalted feelings about it, but that their awareness must move beyond a simple intellectual awareness of the teaching. It is only when sinners come to a deeper awareness of their inability and know that they can do nothing in the spiritual realm that they will begin to look to Christ to do it all. When the Gospel of Christ alone teaches us that Christ alone saves, this should make us know that true faith must come from Christ and it must rest in Christ alone.

Surely the great problem with Pelagian/Arminian teaching at this point should come into light. By definition the Pelagian/Arminian teaching does not teach men that they are utterly helpless, but that it remains up to them to make that final choice and that they make that choice of their own “free-will.” It seems that the vast majority of the Reformed today don’t see that as a problem and so they simply see Pelagian/Arminian teaching as an error, but they don’t see it as a deadly error. They see it as something of a problem, but they don’t see it as an error of another gospel. But the truth of the matter is that this is a vital point of distinction that shows how far the Reformed in our day is from the Reformed of older times.

If a crucial issue is the will, then it is crucial to make people aware of their sin and of their inability in order for them to see the true nature of the Gospel. The Pelagian/Arminian may instruct men to some degree that they are sinners, but they will not instruct men about sin enough to show them that they are dead in sin and must look to Christ alone. Instead, they will instruct men enough to show them that they need a Savior and yet tell men that the final choice is to made of their own “free-will.”

The older Reformed method was to teach men that they were dead and had no ability to save themselves but that they needed to look to God to give them life in their soul so that they could believe in Christ alone. The modern Reformed practice is more like the Arminian in that they seem to simply try to get men to believe and to pray a prayer. This practice, regardless of what a person may profess to believe, is simply nothing more than what the Pelagian/Arminian view and is in accordance with the Pelagian/Arminian doctrine of free-will. When those with the Pelagian/Arminian view accuse those with the historical Calvinist view of being a Hyper-Calvinist, the real issue is that the professing Reformed person is evangelizing according to the Pelagian/Arminian doctrine and is not Reformed at that point. It seems as if the older Reformed view on the issue has been virtually lost.

Calvinism and Arminianism 24

December 27, 2014

One of the greatest differences between the evangelical Calvinists and those they deride as “Hyper-calvinists,” is the evangelical Calvinists believe Arminians and Pelagians are otherwise sound “Christians,” and refer to them as their brothers and sisters. The Hyper-calvinists believe that as long as one is unconverted from his natural freewill state by the operation of the Spirit of God, and converted to the free grace of God by the Gospel of the grace of God, there is insufficient evidence to consider such as a “Christian,” or a “brother or sister.” This is not to say that they consign them to hell–that is not their desire, for by their own experience they understand that before that gracious divine call out of darkness, they, too, were “vessels of wrath even as others.” Arminians and Pelagians are as much in need for the gospel as any “heathen” or pagan. Calvinists would do well to “evangelize” their Arminian or Pelagian “brothers and sisters.”

So it is not irreligious, idle, or superfluous, but in the highest degree wholesome and necessary, for a Christian to know whether of not his will has anything to do in matters pertaining to salvation. Indeed, let me tell you, this is the hinge on which our discussion turns, the crucial issue between us; our aim is, simply, to investigate what ability ‘free-will’ has, in what respect it is the subject of Divine action and how it stands related to the grace of God. If we know nothing of these things, we shall know nothing whatsoever of Christianity, and shall be in worse case than any people on earth…That God’s mercy works everything, and our will works nothing, but is rather the object of Divine working, else all will not be ascribed to God. (Luther’s Reply to Erasmus)

It is impossible to get around the thought of Luther as to how vital the doctrine of man’s inability and bondage was to him and his formulation of justification by faith alone. One simply has to conclude that Luther was incorrect or that our squeamishness about preaching and teaching on the inability of man was wrong. Corresponding to that, we would also have to conclude that Luther’s formulation of justification by faith alone was wrong as well. But if we arrive at those conclusions, it has major ramifications for the modern day. If Luther was indeed wrong, then the heart of the Reformation was wrong. But if Luther was right, we have deviated from his teaching so much that we would be condemned by him for virtually returning to Rome. But again, to repeat the point that has been stated in multiple recent BLOGS, Luther said that “if we know nothing of these things, we shall know nothing whatsoever of Christianity.” This should resound in our ears. Even more, however, Luther said that if we know nothing of these things we “shall be in worse case than any people on earth.” This should get our attention.

Are we truly missing the vital point or the crucial issue of the Gospel in our day? Are those who stress the inability of man and teach others that as an important part of understanding the Gospel of grace alone right instead of being Hyper-Calvinists? Could it be possible that the teachings and doctrines of Arminianism in our day should not be embraced as a version of Christianity but instead viewed as a deadly error? These are serious, serious issues and they should be viewed as if the weight of eternity rested upon them (in a sense).

While the teaching of the inability of man is seen as unimportant in evangelism today, it was vital to Luther and his views of the Gospel of grace alone. Luther thought it was vital to investigate what ability “free-will” had and how it was related to the Divine action and the grace of God. We must discover that once again if we are going to understand the Gospel as taught by Luther and the Gospel that swept through Europe and other parts of the world as well. It was that Gospel that change hearts, the Church, nations, and perhaps the world in that day. It was either the eternal Gospel of Jesus Christ or it was not. Does God’s mercy work everything and our will work nothing as Luther said? Is our will the object of the Divine working or does God respond to our “free-will” as Luther taught? If our answer is less than it is the Divine working that does all, then all cannot be ascribed to God alone.

Luther took great pains in his life, writings, and preaching to protect and stress the sovereign grace of God because that is the only kind of grace there is. Sinners are saved by sovereign grace and that grace alone and we must fight and do all we do to protect the Gospel of grace alone because it alone declares this sovereign grace. Luther was like Paul when he said “I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel” (Galatians 1:6). The Gospel that is not of grace alone is not the Gospel of the grace of Christ and is a different gospel. If we preach, teach, and evangelize with a Gospel that is not by grace alone we have a different gospel. We have to wake up to this.

The Church needs a true reformation and revival in our day as well. It needs to be rescued and delivered from the Pelagian/Arminian teaching of “free-will” as badly as the Church needed to be rescued from Rome in Luther’s day. Unless God is pleased to open our eyes and hearts to the vital issue of the will and how it relates to the Gospel of grace alone, we will plod along arguing about our Confessions, the sacraments, and other things, but we will have no power and no light. We will continue to have many who are Reformed in word and creed but Pelagian in heart and practice. We will have many who will continue to espouse sovereignty in teaching but refuse it in practice. That is what we will have until people are awakened to what they give up when they accept “free-will” as anything other than dangerous to the Gospel of grace alone.